LONDON A-Z An alphabetical journey through the capital's museums Linley Sambourne House
Location: 18 Stafford Terrace, Kensington W8 7BH [map] Open: by timed tour only (two on Wednesdays; four at weekends) Admission: £6 Brief summary: preserved (and character-full) Victorian townhouse Website:www.rbkc.gov.uk/linleysambournehouse Time to set aside: an hour and a half
You may be thinking "who?" and "where?" and "you what?", but by the end of this review I hope you'll be asking "why haven't I been?"
LinleySambourne was a cartoonist for Punch magazine, and a privileged social climber. His position owed more than a little to luck, gaining his apprenticeship in 1867 via a friend of the family who just happened to know Punch's editor. A forty year career followed, rising up the ranks to become the magazine's chief cartoonist with a recognisably Victorian style. It wouldn't surprise me if there's still a doctor's waiting room somewhere with some of his work piled on a table.
Success allowed Linley to establish a family home in Kensington. 18 Stafford Terrace was a tall townhouse with a scullery in the basement and maid's room in the attic, with the floors inbetween bedecked in the very latest middle-class style. Most similar properties have long been gutted and modernised, but the Sambourne house has survived pretty much untouched thanks to the efforts of the Victorian Society. This august preservation body held its very first meetings here at number 18 fifty years ago. The place later passed into the care of the Greater London Council, and today the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea are in charge. Rest assured, the building's in good hands.
You'll only get to go round the house if you time your visit for one of the ten weekly tours. Some of these are fairly ordinary, but a few are costumed affairs led by a talented actress and they're the tours I'd recommend. Booking in advance is advised, although I just turned up and got lucky. You might not want to be so reckless. Entrance is via the mini-shop in the basement, and the tour begins with a 10 minute video introduced by Linley's great-grandson, the Earl of Snowdon. From there a RBKC operative will lead you back out into the street and up to the front door, beyond which awaits your host for the next hour.
Our chaperone was Mrs Reffell, the Sambourne's engaging and chatty cook, although on other occasions I suspect the tour guide is a character from above stairs. Never once stepping out of character, she led us around the interior from one room to the next, recounting stories and anecdotes about the family of the house. In the dining room we heard of the dinner party the Sambournes had enjoyed 'last night', and were also treated to intimate snippets of social gossip. That Mr Oscar Wilde, they'd been round to his recently, whereas Mr William Morris and his wife weren't quite the consummate hosts they'd expected. Mrs R pointed out the expensive Morris wallpaper her employer had pasted up and told us (scandalously) how much it had cost. All the facts and anecdotes were historically accurate, of course, and had been lifted from Marion Sambourne's diary.
Up in the attic we entered Linley's airy studio. A back catalogue of sketches and prints filled several shelves, all of the boxes the genuine article, as was the old wooden desk and assorted objects thereon. A central easel supported a somewhat saucy cartoon, composed (as with all LS's later work) by photographing live models with his new-fangled camera and then copying the result. Often the live model was a member of the family, press-ganged into standing in the garden in some ridiculous costume or holding some important accessory in their hand. The bathroom doubled up as a dark room, and a display of prints across the east wall confirmed that the master of the house had a particular fancy for snapping semi-clad females. Mrs Reffell ushered us out of there fairly swiftly, simultaneously thrilled and embarrassed by her master's fruity fetish.
More rooms to see, ending up in the perfectly preserved first floor drawing room. Again various points of period detail were highlighted and set in context, like the elegant vine painted on the mirror by the front window which was actually covering a crack and had been added to save buying a replacement. Delightful, and the hour was over too soon. Mine was a (very) lightly-attended tour, but the actress playing part of Mrs Reffell made every effort throughout to involve us all in the experience. "Do you have a bicycle, sir?" "Are those really your normal clothes, madam?" We responded with good-natured bonhomie, slightly out of place as visitors from the future, but very much the welcomed guests. The more you join in and interact, the more you'll enjoy it. And you will enjoy it. Why haven't you been? by tube: High Street Kensington
If you can't get there in person: Behind Closed Doors - meet the staff in this video preview House Tour - a photographic journey around number 18
TfL have been playing with the Circle line over the weekend. They've been practising for December, when the orbital route is split apart and all the trains start/finish their journeys at Hammersmith instead. The Circle will be broken at Edgware Road which then becomes a key interchange hub. But can this ageing station cope? I'm not convinced.
Here's how the new split-Circle arrangements at Edgware Road should work:
Platform 1: All eastbound trains (from Hammersmith) [Circle][H&C] Platform 2: Start/end of the line for orbital Circle line trains [Circle]
Platform 3: District line trains to Wimbledon [District] Platform 4: Westbound trains to Hammersmith [Circle][H&C]
It ought to be simple. Each of Edgware Road's four platforms will have its own dedicated service, so all passengers need to do is go to the correct platform and wait. But over the weekend, without even any temporary signage in place, it didn't feel simple at all. Now wonder the member of TfL platform staff I spoke to described his weekend experience as a "nightmare".
Case study: arriving at Edgware Road platform 2 on a terminating Circle Line train "Last and final stop. This train terminates at Edgware Road. Please cross to platform 1 to complete your eastbound journey. All change please, all change." It's hard to see that the driver could have done more to inform passengers about what was going on. Even so, only 80% of the train's passengers disembarked. The rest sat where they were, either because they "knew" that Circle line trains didn't terminate here or because English wasn't their first language and nobody had warned them in advance that the Circle was no longer a Circle. Eventually most of the non-movers twigged, but some sat tight in blissful ignorance. Meanwhile the first westbound passengers clambered on board, ready for their Circle line journey to High Street Kensington and Victoria. An over-stretched member of TfL staff moved down the platform, knocking on each carriage in turn and yelling "All change, all change please!" Passengers duly disembarked, even those who'd just got on because they actually knew what they were doing. A fluster of animated conversation with the member of staff ensued, and the westbound passengers re-boarded the train they'd boarded correctly in the first place.
One particular Spanish couple stood baffled on platform 2, trying to work out what to do next. They had a pair of large suitcases in tow, no doubt fresh from the Heathrow Express at Paddington, and their command of English wasn't great. "Tower Hill?" they mumbled. TfL-Bloke directed them towards Platform 1 and told them to catch the next Circle line train. Absolutely right, mate. Alas the first train to arrive was an eastbound Hammersmith and City train, and the Spanish couple needed a lot of persuasion not to climb on board. Meanwhile the westbound Circle line train on platform 2 closed its doors and set off. It struck me that this train was actually going to Tower Hill, but the couple had been advised to get off it and wait for a train going round the other way. This should have been good advice because the clockwise journey's normally quicker, but not in this case. A lengthy wait ensued and no eastbound trains arrived at all. Circle line trains will run less frequently under this new revised timetable (six an hour, rather than seven an hour) so expect to wait up to 10 minutes in the future. The "next train" indicators provided no useful information. The system at Edgware Road is supremely useless - ancient boxes with weedy red text, and seemingly unable to announce any arrival until a minute before it happens. If they're not upgraded before December when Edgware Road becomes a key Circle line hub, I'd expect customer annoyance and dissatisfaction to be high.
Another Circle line service arrived on platform 2, and another few hundred people crossed to platform 1 to complete their eastbound journey. Meanwhile some of those already waiting on platform 1 crossed back to platform 2, thinking an eastbound Circle line train had finally arrived. Wrong, it terminated here, all change please. The new influx of passengers waited semi-patiently, adding an extra five minutes to all of their journeys, before the next eastbound train finally appeared. This was another Hammersmith and City line train, to Whitechapel, and it was already fairly full. Within seconds it was a lot fuller. The Spanish couple looked around for assistance, but within such a large crowd there was none. They tried checking their tube map, but it didn't actually show the weekend's temporary service and wasn't much help. Eventually, just before the doors closed, they clambered aboard and set off in cattle class conditions. I hope they changed trains before Aldgate East, because it's no fun lugging a pair of suitcases across from one platform to the other, and it's a mighty inefficient way to get to Tower Hill. They should have waited. One minute later a Circle line service finally arrived, going precisely where they wanted to go, and it was nigh empty. Ah, if only they'd picked a different weekend to travel, one when they'd not been forced to change trains at Edgware Road. Alas, come December, none of us will have that option.
The extended Circle line (anti-clockwise) Edgware Road → Hammersmith (via Liverpool Street)
Edgware Road (platform 2) round to Tower Hill: All absolutely normal. The train said CIRCLE LINE on the front. Given that nobody this far out would be travelling beyond Paddington, nobody could possibly be confused. Aldgate: Somewhere round the bend from Tower Hill, the destination on the front of the train changed. It no longer said CIRCLE LINE, it said HAMMERSMITH (via Shepherd's Bush). The 'Next train' indicator, however, still read 'Circle Line via King's Cross'. Liverpool Street to Baker Street: The front of the train said HAMMERSMITH (via Shepherd's Bush), and the 'next train' indicators on the platforms also said 'Hammersmith'. There were absolutely no trains labelled CIRCLE LINE. I wonder how many passengers over the weekend waited patiently for a Circle Line service that never ever arrived. Baker Street: An A3 poster had been slapped over the line map on this platform, advising passengers of the "Restricted service this weekend, no Circle line service from this platform". I suspect that most people never read it. (Oh, and btw, same again next weekend!) Edgware Road (platform 4): The train driver did sterling work reading out all the important options for those changing lines. Going to Hammersmith? Stay on. Going to Paddington? Stay on. Going to Wimbledon? Get off and cross (easily) to platform 3. Going to High Street Kensington? Erm, well, maybe the next train's from platform 3, or maybe it's up and over the steps to platform 2, I'm not sure, listen for announcements. This is likely to become a much-despised connection in the future, trying desperately to work out which train's leaving next from one of two non-adjacent platforms. Paddington (H&C): In the past, most passengers trying to get from King's Cross to Paddington would have arrived at Paddington (District & Circle) station. It's well positioned for the Mainline concourse, and connects easily with Bakerloo line services. In future, after the Circle line splits, everybody's going to end up at Paddington (H&C) station instead. This is a nasty small station with inadequate exits, located a long way away from most of the mainline services, and requiring considerable unpleasant yomping of heavy luggage. Expect a higher number of missed connections in the future. Royal Oak to Hammersmith: Fantastic. The split-Circle arrangement brings twice as many trains to Hammersmith, so West London residents are the true winners here. For the rest of us, alas, this change means all change. Prepare to hate it.
You won't have spotted it on the TfL website (it's ridiculously well hidden). You won't have spotted it in the 27/28 June service changes leaflet available at stations (it's in millimetre-high text on the map, concealed in the key). You might have spotted it in TfL's weekly engineering works email:
Circle line: Customers travelling between Bayswater and Baker Street in either direction will need to change trains at Edgware Road as there will be no through service.
But I wonder, even now, if you've spotted the significance. It's all because later this year TfL are planning to breakthe Circle lineapart at Edgware Road, sending anti-clockwise trains to terminate at Hammersmith instead. No more round-and-round services, not after December. And this weekend they're having a practice to see how it works. Or, indeed, if it works. Yesterday, to find out for myself, I became one of the very first passengers to ride the nu-Circle line in its entirety. And once was enough.
An extended Circle line journey Hammersmith → Edgware Road (via Liverpool Street)
Hammersmith: You don't usually see Circle line trains at Hammersmith [photo], and for good reason - there's no orbital track at a station with buffers. But there were Circle line trains departing every ten minutes yesterday, even though they were very hard to spot. There were no signs and no announcements admitting that anything untoward was going on, nor that there might be a yellow cuckoo in the pink H&C nest. No clues either on the "next train" indicator, because this only shows which of the three platforms is leaving first, not where that train is going. Doesn't normally matter, does it? Every train departing Hammersmith is going to Paddington, King's Cross and Whitechapel, then maybe on to Plaistow or Barking. But times are no longer normal. Rears of trains are not to be trusted, so the only way to find out where they're heading is to walk right up to the far end, to the driver's cab, and to read the destination shown on the front. It definitely said WHITECHAPEL on the front of mine when I boarded. But I think the driver tweaked it before he set off, because I stayed on the train right to the end and we didn't go to Whitechapel, we went to Edgware Road. Twice. Wood Lane: There are no "next train" indicators here, nor at any station between Hammersmith and Paddington. That's probably why passengers waiting on the platform were giving us funny looks as a CIRCLE LINE train pulled in. No, really, it's true. Just climb aboard and stop worrying, because I bet you're not going any further than Liverpool Street anyway. Paddington: That's Paddington H&C. I'd be visiting the other Paddington underground station later. It would have been quicker to walk (or indeed crawl). Edgware Road (platform 1): In we pulled for the first time. Eventually we'd be pulling into the adjacent platform [photo], in the same direction, after a whistlestop tour of Central London. But not for another hour. One 'normal' circuit of the age-old Circle line ahead. Baker Street: It was only at this point that I noticed something strange. Audio silence. Usually there's a disembodied voice announcing the names of each station and where the train's heading, but on this service there was nothing. Quite pleasant, actually, but very odd. King's Cross St Pancras: Onward, ever onward. All the next train indicators on all the platforms along this northern rim were showing the train as a CIRCLE LINE service, because it was, and absolutely no passengers were confused by anything at all. The clockwise nu-Circle line journey's none too confusing round here, thankfully. Liverpool Street: But did we get an announcement confirming that the next stop was Aldgate, not Aldgate East? Did we hell. Aldgate: See, I told you we weren't going to Whitechapel. Anybody who'd boarded at Hammersmith expecting this to be a normal H&C service would be pretty annoyed at this point. But nobody in their right mind would do that, would they, not when the District Line offers a more direct service. Tower Hill: After a long pause at Aldgate, the train chugged round to Tower Hill and lots of people got on. Then, when the doors closed and we set off, the driver was finally able to switch on the on-board announcements. "This is a Circle line train via Liverpool Street and King's Cross. The next station is Aldgate." Oops. Most of the newly-boarded foreign passengers (and there were many) looked troubled by this and hurriedly checked their maps. Damn, it looked like they must have got on the wrong train at Tower Hill, damn. One Japanese gentlemen even stood up to alight at the next station, thinking he'd need to catch a train back the other way. And then the train arrived at Monument instead. He quickly deduced that the rogue announcement must have been driver error, not passenger error, and sat back down again. Cannon Street: "This is a Circle line train via Embankment and Victoria. The next station is Mansion House." That's more like it. Embankment: Busy along here, huh? I was glad I'd grabbed a seat 23 stations ago, because everybody boarding here was having to stand. Westminster: The train still said CIRCLE LINE on the front, but here we got the first admission from our driver that this might not be a normal Circle line service after all. "Customers are reminded that this Circle Line service terminates at Edgware Road. To continue your onward journey please cross to Platform 1 at Edgware Road." A bit premature, maybe, but we'd had absolutely no clues before this (and wouldn't get another before Paddington). South Kensington: Ohmigodohmigod. My carriage was suddenly invaded by a troupe of French schoolchildren, fresh from a visit to the London Transport Museum. I had to endure several uncomfortable minutes of Gallic giggling, and bottles of water being passed in front of my face, and being stared at intently by a boy called Clement. Gloucester Road: "This is a Circle line train via High Street Kensington and Paddington." True! High Street Kensington: "This is a Circle line train via Paddington and Baker Street." False! The driver was forced to switch off the on-board announcements after this, because the system couldn't yet cope with the new premature stopping arrangements. Bayswater: Hurrah, Clément et ses amis est descendu. And the train still said CIRCLE LINE on the front, even though it was terminating at EDGWARE ROAD. Paddington: One stop from the Circle's end, and the driver finally got round to mentioning that we weren't going much further. "Customers are reminded that this train terminates at Edgware Road." Bad luck for all those suitcase-laden souls who'd arrived at Paddington on mainline trains from the West, because they'd only be able to travel one stop before having to change trains again. This proposed Circle line severance isn't going to please everybody. Edgware Road (platform 2): An hour and twenty minutes after setting out I was back at Edgware Road "where this train terminates. All change please, all change." And that's where things got messy...
I'll tell you tomorrow about what an organisational nightmare Edgware Road was. Plus I'll tell you why the anti-clockwise nu-Circle line is likely to be even more confusing.
Let me clarify that statement. I have enormous respect for anyone who chooses to serve in our Armed Forces. I always pause on Remembrance Sunday to remember the fallen soldiers who protected our freedom during two World Wars. And I give thanks that I live in a country where national service remains optional. But I've really never felt the urge to stand up in public and support our lads for all the killing, and avoidance of killing, that they do. I'll do respect, but I can't do pride.
And yet so many people support our Armed Forces unequivocally. If anybody even mentions 'Our Lads', they're ready with a volley of praise. When there's a foreign war on, they're the ones with a Union Flag fluttering from the bathroom window. And when a platoon of local troops returns from foreign service, they're out on the street cheering everyone back at the homecoming parade. I'm not mocking their pro-military attitude in any way. But I just don't get it myself.
OK, I can understand this reverence if you've been in the forces yourself, or if a member of your family has enlisted and is serving abroad. But what draws folk with no military connections to become devoted flag-wavers for our armed forces? Why do so many follow the tabloid line that Our Lads are to be venerated alongside celebrities and footballers? What is it about this one particular public service that inspires such elevated levels of pride in so many, whereas (for example) our doctors and nurses slog on week after week unrecognised?
It's not the building that's 100, nor the collection inside, but the museum's name and identity. For it was on June 26th 1909 that the "Science Museum" formally split itself off from the V&A across the road. Originally the South Kensington Museum, this repository started off as a museum of the industrial and decorative arts, funded from the success of 1851's nearby Great Exhibition. The steady accumulation of apparatus and instruments during the 19th century created a growing technological nucleus, until eventually the separation of the artistic and scientific collections became necessary. And it's the centenary of that divide which is being celebrated today.
If you've not been down to the Science Museum since you were a kid, you may not have realised that it's changed. If you have offspring of your own, however, you're probably more than familiar with the place. The heart of the collection's still reassuringly familiar, but there's now a lot more now to appeal to a younger more interactive generation. Oh yes, the Science Museum is a sprightly centenarian, and no mistake.
Once you've got past the two shops near the entrance, most people start by exploring the Making the Modern World gallery. This is a timeline of world-changing artefacts extending the length of the ground floor (with a darkroom of space artefacts positioned anachronistically along the way). Ten exhibits have recently been picked out as special Centenary icons, and these are marked by a special plaque on the floor alongside. You're invited to stand in awe in front of each amazing object in turn, and then vote for which of the ten you believe to be the most groundbreaking afterwards.
First up is the steam engine, invented two centuries before this museum was born, and then the rather younger V2 rocket, whose engine transformed the way we think about warcraft and propulsion. A few of the ten are included because of what they represent, not because the example on show is anything particularly special. An electric telegraph, a Model T Ford, a model of the DNA double helix. But a few are the breathtaking genuine article. That's Stephenson's Rocket, the first proper steam locomotive, so close that you can almost touch it (please don't). The specks in that tiny brass case are mouldy samples used by Alexander Fleming to isolate penicillin in the 1930s. And that squat cone-shaped metal box at the far end of the gallery, the one with the seriouslyburnt bottom - that's been round the Moon, that has. It's the actual Apollo 10capsule, part of a dress rehearsal for the lunar landings 40 years ago, and here it is for you to view in deepest Kensington. What's not to love?
Keep going and you'll reach the newest part of the museum, the high and airy Wellcome Wing. There are some push-button futuristic screen bits on the upper floors, but this extension's really about making money. Buy your tickets for the IMAX 3D cinema here ('U' certificate only), or maybe stop off to purchase the results of an experiment involving coffee beans, lactose and boiling water. Just don't go looking for the excellent Launchpad in the basement - they've moved the hands-on physics extravaganza up to the third floor. Note to interested adults: you'll have more fun (and get fewer funny looks) if you take an eight-year-old with you.
But you'll find the genuine Science Museum tucked away on some of the other floors, away from the major attractions. Many of these areas haven't been upgraded in years, and visiting cub scout groups show their displeasure by nipping hurriedly through the heritage displays in seconds. The Mathematics section, for example, still looks as if a bunch of 1950s geometry teachers made some 3D shapes out of coloured card and then bunged in a few slide rules and pairs of compasses for good measure. The Computing area, once cutting edge, is now lodged firmly in a historical era of cogs, valves and chip-fitted Sinclair calculators. And the Maritime galleries contain an unfeasibly large collection of diving helmets, oil-rig drill-bits and propeller shafts. The number of model ships gathered here verges on the obsessive, and on entering yet another aisle to see yet another British Empire steamboat in a glass case it's easy to imagine that you're still seeing the museum as it was 100 years ago.
If you've not been back to the Science Museum lately, maybe this weekend would be a good choice. Three days of special centenary events kick off today and run through until Sunday, and will no doubt attract large crowds. Alternatively, why not wait and sneak in midweek before the school summer holidays begin. Then maybe you can go stand on the flat-packed plastic suspension bridge without being knocked over, or go play on the pulleys in the Launchpad when nobody's looking, or just go and admire the very finest technological exhibits laid out in all their glory. The Science Museum is for kids, but it's not just for kids. And 100 years on, its history is still the future.
Warning: minority interest post Bow's buses are changing. Changing a bit, anyway. And I know that some of my readers actually live round here, and occasionally catch buses, and might care, so here's the heads-up. Other readers may want to come back tomorrow, when I'll be visiting somewhere you've actually been.
Route 8: Bow Church - Victoria It's fiveyears this month since London's beloved Routemasters were withdrawn from Route 8, which kicks off in Bow. Five years on something else is being withdrawn, at the end of service tomorrow, and that's the last mile of the route. Number 8s have been chugging down to Victoria since 1992, but from Saturday they'll be stopping short and terminating at Oxford Circus. There's a good reason for this curtailment, apparently, which is that Oxford Street is seriously over-stuffed with buses. By stopping the number 8s short there'll be 20 fewer buses an hour clogging up the 500 metres of road between Oxford Circus and Bond Street stations, and every little helps. To make up for this break of service, and to ensure that buses still serve the middle of Mayfair, another route is being extended. Buses on Camden route C2 (which currently terminate at Oxford Circus) will now continue down to Victoria, carefully avoiding Oxford Street along the way. East London residents will then need to take two buses to get to Victoria, not one, which'll cost a few pay-as-you-go users twice as much. On the plus side, however, a shorter journey for the 8 ought to make the service more regular and reliable.
Route N8: Hainault - Victoria The N8's also being cut back from Victoria to Oxford Circus. Need to get a night bus from Victoria to East London? Sorry, but from Saturday no single bus will take you further than Liverpool Street.
Route 15: Blackwall - Paddington The 15 may not stop in Bow, but many of the fleet are currently based at Bow Bus Garage in Fairfield Road. Not after tomorrow, though. From Saturday they're all being transferred to West Ham Garage, a huge new complex built as overspill to make up for lost garages within the Olympic Park. Yes, I know, who cares. But...
Route 15 (heritage): Tower Hill - Trafalgar Square TfL still run two Routemaster services, one of which is on route 15. Ten old buses are used to run the timetable, and the entire stock is currently held at Bow Garage. This means that the buses have to run empty into town from Bow in the morning, and trundle back to Bow at night. So if I'm ever outside my house at quarter past nine in the morning, there's often a big red Routemaster trundling by on its way to the City. The sight never fails to make me smile, because it means that RMs linger on in Bow even five years after they were officially culled. But not any more, not after tomorrow. On Saturday these heritage Routemasters are also being relocated to West Ham Garage. Off will come the "BW" plate outside the driver's cab, to be replaced no doubt by a less local "WH". And I'll never see these characterful workhorses chugging round Bow Church again, which is a damned shame. Ding ding.
Route 25: Ilford - Oxford Circus It's five years tomorrow since bendy buses were first introduced on Route 25. Sorry, they're not changing at all. By rights the 5-year contract ought to be ending this weekend, but a two year extension means Boris can't remove Bow's bendies until at least 2011.
Route 205: Mile End - Paddington And one bit of good news for local residents, but you'll have to wait a bit. At the moment there's only one bus that goes down Bow Road to central London and that's the 25. From 29th August there'll be another, because the 205 is being extended from Mile End to Bow Church. At last, a choice of bus that isn't bendy. At last, a choice of central London destination that isn't Oxford Circus. And (even better) the 205's a 24 hour service, so if you're staggering east to E3 after a heavy night out and the bendy 25s are full, at last there's an alternative. You lose some, you win some.
Was it a bit warm on your tube train yesterday? Aww, poor you. Then you'll probably have been over-excited by this report in yesterday's Evening Standard, which I've reproduced below. Don't be over-excited. Here's why.
Cooler summer for commuters as Mayor unveils aircon Tube That's a very carefully worded headline. It says nothing untrue, but you've probably read far too much into it. The cooler summer won't be this summer. Only a minority of commuters will benefit. And all Boris did was unveil the first fruits of a project launched by Ken. Don't be over-excited. And don't read too much into it.
The Tube has its first air-conditioned train. That's one train. The Tube may have 500-or-so trains, but so far only one has air-conditioning. And it's not in service yet. Mayor Boris Johnson said passengers will be "terrifically impressed". Emphasis there on the word "will".
He said: "For thousands of clammy Tube passengers some relief is finally in sight. The Tube has millions of clammy passengers. Alas, relief is only "in sight" for thousands. We have now begun testing the first of 191 super cool and spacious new trains." You know why the new trains are spacious, don't you? It's because there'll be fewer seats, so you'll be more likely to have to stand. Cool, but not necessarily comfortable.
Mr Johnson, who boarded the new air-conditioned train at an Oxford test track, said: "Having taken it for a test run myself I can vouch that passengers are going to be terrifically impressed." The test track's actually in Leicestershire, not Oxford. Here's a website about the Old Dalby track, including some photos taken this week. And the first train started test runs there in March, it's just that Boris didn't visit until yesterday.
He said the air conditioning "will keep passengers comfortable whatever the weather". "more comfortable", maybe. It'll be lovely to sit in an air conditioned train during a heatwave, but that won't stop your fellow passengers from ramming into the carriages like cattle.
All the trains to have air-conditioning will operate on the subsurface lines. That's really important to know, because there are only four sub-surface lines. Passengers on the other seven lines will continue to overheat for the foreseeable future. The first will run on the Metropolitan line, to be followed by the Circle, District and Hammersmith & City. The correct order is actually Metropolitan first (starting 2010), then Circle and Hammersmith & City (starting 2011), and finally District (starting 2013). The final upgraded train won't be in service until 2015, at least six summers hence, and ten years after plans to introduce aircon were first agreed.
However, the cooler trains won't be in service until next summer. You're still reading far too much into this, aren't you? Please, don't expect the entire Metropolitan stock to change overnight. The new air-conditioned trains can only be introduced at a rate of one every 10 days, so during 2010 you'll still be more likely to get on board an old hot one than a new cool one.
And for commuters using the deep level lines, such as the Victoria, Central and Northern, it will be years before they get relief from the sweltering conditions. These lines were built long before air conditioning was developed and there is no space for such bulky equipment in the narrow tunnels. Oh this is so important. The deep level trains are staying hot and sweaty, and don't kid yourself otherwise. This aircon-lessness isn't because Boris doesn't care, and it isn't because there's not enough money, it's because upgrading them would be wholly impractical. Deep tube tunnels are narrower than the subsurface tunnels, so the trains have to be smaller, so there's no room to cram aircon equipment and passengers into the carriages. When you're feeling hot and sweaty down the Bakerloo, blame the Victorians, not the Mayor.
The Mayor said: "Cooling the deeper lines remains a considerable challenge. A crack team of Transport for London engineers is focused on that and is concentrating on the Victoria line in particular." Don't get your hopes up. The crack engineers are focusing on the stations, not the trains. Brand new Victoria line carriages are arriving imminently, and they won't have any aircon at all.
The Tube's 3.5 million daily users face yet another long, hot and very sweaty summer with in-train temperatures expected to reach as high as 47C which can cause some passengers to pass out. Do let us know when this long, hot and very sweaty summer begins, won't you? It's Midsummer's Day already, and I can't say my daily commute's come anywhere close to Death Valley meltdown yet.
Measures to keep the ageing network cool have been hit by funding cuts. Instead Tube bosses will resurrect their old campaign of advising passengers to carry bottled water with them, not board a train if they feel unwell and to get off at the next stop if they start to feel ill. Faced with the choice of a multi-million pound rolling stock upgrade or a few bottles of water, guess what, TfL's plumped for the water. And that's absolutely the right choice, if you ask me. It gets unpleasantly hot on the underground for a few weeks every year, but far better to put up with that and spend the money on something that'll be of benefit all year round. Something like new signalling, or modernised stations, or repaired track - something genuinely useful. Tube passengers really need to pull themselves together and stop moaning about something which makes a few summer hours not quite as pleasant as they could be. Air con - it'll be nice to have, but it's hardly the end of the world without it.
Have you seen one yet? One of the Street Pianos? They're dotted around central London, out in the open, waiting for you to turn up and play. 30 upright pianos, of the kind you might find in a church hall or a Victorian parlour, left out in the elements for the enjoyment of the capital's populace. Don't worry, they've all got a plastic cover for protection, so if it rains they shouldn't get soaked.
The project's entitled Play me, I'm yours, and the whole thing's a performance artwork devised by multidisciplinarian Luke Jerram*. London's not the first place he's tried this. Pianos have previously been scattered across Sao Paulo, Sydney, Birmingham and (oh yes) Bury St Edmunds. Apparently Bristol's next, and they'll be getting fresh instruments because all of London's are being donated to local schools and community groups. Assuming they don't all get nicked, that is.
You can find the 30 musical locations on the Street Pianos website. Each piano has its own page where you can see photos and post comments, and maybe even upload details of a keyboard-related singalong you've got planned. Don't worry if you don't have any music, there's a songbook attached to every instrument. All the classics are included - Hey Jude, The Lambeth Walk, I'd Like To Teach The World To Sing, Nellie The Elephant. It's lovely idea, especially if you can actually play, or sing, or at least drunkenly tinkle.**
The City's pianos were installed at the end of last week, so I trooped round over the weekend to see how they were being used. Here's what I found...
St Mary Axe (opposite the Gherkin): It being the weekend, all the local City workers had gone home and the piano lurked unnoticed beneath a tree. Leadenhall Market: Another weekend deadspot, but I found it easily enough outside a shuttered fishmongers. I thought I'd have a play, so I tapped out the first phrase of Raindrops Keep Falling On My Head with one finger. My only audience was a workman up a ladder who'd been busy dropping paint scrapings onto the keyboard. Thankfully he failed to sing along. Liverpool Street Station (main exit): I didn't find this one. I'd made the mistake of printing out the map on the website which led me to the wrong "main exit". Ah well. London Wall: I didn't find this one either, because the pin on the website map was in completely the wrong place. If only I'd read the dedicated webpage before I left the house I'd have found it, but I didn't. Take heed, oh piano hunters. Royal Exchange Buildings: Another piano not quite where the map said it was, but I found this one by the tube station entrance. So did a passing group of four European tourists who lifted the plastic cover and attempted to take arty photos of one another playing. They also managed a recognisable chunk of Do Re Mi. Brown's (Old Jewry): This one's a grand piano, but it's a bit of a cheat. It's not in the street, it's inside a restaurant. It's only available to play between 9am and noon, before paying lunch punters arrive. And it's accessible weekdays only. I saw nothing. St Mary-le-Bow Churchyard: Another lonely sidelined instrument, being stared at (but not used) by coffee-drinking punters in the cafe nextdoor. Rather more popular midweek, it appears. St Mary Aldermary: Piano inside church. Closed Fridays, closed weekends, closed after 3:30pm (and closed during lunchtime services). Don't wait until the weekend to explore this project, you'll be disappointed.*** Paternoster Square: Blatantly positioned, and an object of intermittent interest. "Oh I've heard of this," said one woman to her significant other, before walking past. A couple of families stopped to allow their small children to climb up onto the stool and pretend to play. I hung around for five minutes, but no tunes emerged. St Paul's Churchyard: Big churchyard, didn't find it, couldn't hear it either. Millennium Bridge (north side): At last, a crowd. Piano + footfall = atmosphere.**** A group of boys had stopped by (more public school than inner city estate), and one got busy showing off his classical skills to the assembled youngsters. Piano + talent = rare. But he played nothing anybody else knew. Piano + singing = non-existent.
*This is not a Boris-inspired part of the Story of London Festival (Luke seems quite keen that people realise this). ** London's Street Pianos will be available for creative mayhem until July 14th. *** Michael toured the City pianos over the weekend, and found them similarly underused. **** The piano in Soho Square looked rather livelier last night. Could be a winner, this.
So it might come as a surprise to discover that the world's oldest man was born and raised in Hackney. He's 113-year-oldHenry Allingham - last survivor of the Battle of Jutland, last surviving founding member of the Royal Air Force and one of only two surviving WW1 veterans. Henry was elevated to the official status of "world's oldest man" lastFriday, on the death of the previous Japanese incumbent. You might have seen him laying a wreath at the Cenotaph last November, because he still gets about a bit and commands the respect of a grateful nation. Admittedly Henry doesn't live in Hackney any more. His family moved south of the river when he was only 12, and today he lives in a servicemen's home near Brighton. But he's a Hackney boy deep down. So I thought I'd hunt down his childhood home to investigate the secret of his longevity.
Henry Allingham was born in Clapton on June 6th 1896 (that's D-Day, but 48 years too early). According to the Hackney council website - and they ought to know - Henry's childhood home was on Harrington Hill. That's not at the "Murder Mile" end of Lower Clapton, it's in leafier riverside Upper Clapton. North of the pond, north of the station, in a sloping hinterland of residential avenues and more recent apartment infill. Much has changed round here, and Henry wouldn't recognise many surviving buildings from his time in the street, but there's still a bit left if you look carefully.
Harrington Hill's a surprisingly steep street leading down to the banks of the River Lea, which you'll probably have spotted if you've ever walked along Walthamstow Marshes near the railway arches. At the water's edge on High Hill Ferry is a tiny white-topped pub, the AnchorandHope - inaccessible from the footpath opposite but still very popular during the summer months. It was closed when I arrived, but one elderly 'resident' had made his home on the bench outside. He was fast asleep beneath a grotty black sleeping bag, and I'm assuming the bicycle (with a pannier full of blue plastic bags) propped up alongside was his too. I wouldn't give much for his life expectancy, but in this world-beating street who knows?
The road's amazing in one respect, which is for the number of different architectural styles crammed into its 200 metre descent. Alas most are not lovely. I hope that Henry grew up in one of the four remaining Victorian cottages halfway up on the southern side. They're sturdy terraced homes, at least two up and two down, with brickwork cornices and characterful porches. Nextdoor are two pale modern imitations, with tiny windows and pre-built loft extensions, each with a parking space in lieu of a front garden. And everyone else in Harrington Hill lives in a flat.
Immediately behind the pub are the five-storey brick blocks of the High Hill Estate. They were built by the London County Council in the 1930s, and replaced older Victorian stock prone to repeated flooding. And these are the relatively nice flats. A blander late 20th century block rises opposite, presenting a featureless face of wall and window to the street. Further up are a pair of older buildings with chimneystacked roofs, their exterior white paint peeling, divided up into non-luxury living spaces within. And near the summit, blocking the view east from the primary school playground, rises a particularly charm-free eight-storey tower. It's fortunate that Henry escaped when he did, else some 1970s housing officer might have allocated him a fully-plumbed prison cell in the sky.
To get a proper flavour of Henry's childhood home, check out Baker's Hill which runs parallel down to the Lea. Two chunks ofVictorian terrace survive intact, admittedly now with proper fitted kitchens and inside toilets to make home life considerably easier. And one other feature remains mostly the same, which is the great view out across the flat green expanse of Walthamstow Marshes. Maybe it's Harrington Hill's refreshing riverside location that's the true secret of Henry's longevity (or maybe I'm reading too much into the whole thing). Whatever, I hope that locals at the Anchor and Hope will raise a glass to the continued good health of an improbable child born right up their street. Live long in Hackney, and prosper.
"Onward, onwards, north of the border, down Hertfordshire way. The Croxley Green Revels - a tradition that stretches back to 1952. For pageantry is deep in all our hearts and this, for many a girl, is her greatest day" John Betjeman at Croxley Green ("Metro-land", BBC, 1973)
You may never have been to the Croxley Green Revels, but you've probably seen John Betjeman waxing semi-lyrical about it [two minutes into this YouTube clip, if you haven't]. He stopped by in the early 70s to observe the Queen of the Revels in procession round the village, then gently mocked the fair's pomp and faux-heritage before rushing on to some architectural delight in Chorleywood. I, on the other hand, have been to the Croxley Green Revels many times, because this is the village where I grew up. I don't appear in the documentary but I'd have been there somewhere, standing out in my front garden to watch the procession go by, or stuffing my face with an ice cream cornet on the village green afterwards. Yesterday I went back to Croxley on Revels afternoon, after a couple of absent decades, to see if anything much had changed. And, reassuringly, not really.
Quarter to two along New Road, and families still emerge into their tiny terraced front gardens to watch the parade go by. Some stocky dads lean over the fence with lager in hand, others seat their children in canvas chairs at the roadside to get the best view. In my day the Queen of the Revels used to lead the parade on the back of a haycart, sat amongst a court of giggling teenage girls wearing cloaks made out of glossy curtain fabric. Nowadays the chosen form of transport is an electric blue Ford Consul, and the royal party has been downgraded to one miniature princess with three attendants from the local primary schools. The usual motley selection of dressed-up lorries follow on behind, no less imaginatively themed than before although rather fewer in number than I remember. Most of the participants are schoolkids or churchgoers, with smiling OAPs and vintage penny-farthing riders interspersed for good measure. Be patient, normal through traffic will be restored just as soon as the lady in the Fairtrade banana costume has waddled through.
Everyone in the village (if you can call a dormitory suburb with twelve thousand residents a village) then wanders up to the top of the Green for all the fun of the fair. No big wheels or waltzers here, this is a rather tamer affair set around a central arena. Various community organisations are out in force running their own stalls, from crockery smashing with the Scouts to the local church's pancake tent. Spend your pennies wisely and you might go home with a pot plant, a Victoria sponge or even something big and inflatable. I was pleased to find a few lambs penned up in one corner as a reminder of the area's rural past, and relieved not to win a box of lavender smellies in the Macmillan Cancer tombola. Splat a teacher, fish for a rubber duck and queue for a barbecued burger - this event hasn't changed in years.
The focus of the afternoon is always the central arena. This is where the Revels princess gets crowned, and also where she reads a speech from a scroll to "my people in Croxley Green". Neither her tiara nor her proclamation has changed since 1972, I noted reassuringly (even if her throne now looks suspiciously like a garden chair with a bit of gold material thrown over it). Page boy Owen, however, was no doubt relieved that his headgear was a jaunty top hat rather than the embarrassing black floppy felt number of yesteryear.
Several of Croxley's more active associations get to showcase their activities in the arena during the afternoon, giving mums and dads a chance to ooh and ahh at the assembled tiny dancers and taekwondo white belts. And this is also where the maypole dancing takes place. This rural tradition is taken very seriously in Croxley Green, far more so than in most other UK villages, so much so that my upper junior class was drafted into forming the ribbon-twirling squad back in the 1970s. I was very good at it, apparently, but thankfully no cinefilm of my pole dance survives. These days the Brownies perform the honours, and yesterday they did a fine job of skipping in circles until a disastrously tangled "Double Braid" proved their undoing.
Almost everything about the event felt somehow familiar, even down to the happy crowds of young and old milling around the Revels site. But one thing had undoubtedly changed, and that was who they all were. I walked around all afternoon barely recognising anybody, not a soul, that I once knew. All my old schoolmates had moved on, or at least grown up and disguised their features behind wrinkled brows, middle age spread and grey-specked hair. I couldn't be sure, but maybe that was them watching their kids performing in the maypole dancing or footballing display - a generation removed, a tradition maintained. Croxley's community may have transformed, but this New Elizabethan custom shows no sign of dying out yet.
Gallowatch: Even though the expenses scandal has been going on for weeks, thus far my MP appears to have escaped the worst of it. Surely the Right HonourableGeorgeGalloway, member for Bethnal Green and Bow, must have a few dodgy skeletons in his financial closet. Could reporters at the Telegraph possibly have missed something during their six week scrutiny? Can citizen journalism bring down the career of Gorgeous George? Or is this smooth operator clean as a whistle? I thought I'd find out.
It's long been possible to track GG's Parliamentary attendance record. From this we discover that George has only spoken in three Westminster debates this year, and only bothered to turn up and vote four times. More wasteful of time than of money, it would seem. And now it's possible to uncover similarly detailed information about his reimbursed costs. All of George's Incidental Expenses have been published and are in the public domain (admittedly with big black bits crossed out), so I've had a delve to see what I could find.
And he buys mystery things that cost £66.37, only I have absolutely no idea what they are because everything relevant has been ██████ out. Imagine what criminally wasteful overspend this might be. Or most probably not.
And he spends pays someone to maintain his website. £1575 to create it, then 12 hours a week at £30 an hour thereafter to maintain and update it. Ten thousand quid in six months. That's rather a lot, by the sound of it, given what a not-terribly dynamicwebsite it is. As a constituent, I wouldn't say he's using his communication allowance terribly effectively.
But, all things considered, George's history of backdated claims is distinctly underwhelming. And I for one am appalled. How dare my MP spend so little! When everyone else in the Commons is haemorrhaging public money left, right and centre, how dare my East End representative be so restrained. Why aren't we feeling the ripple effect of Parliamentary wastage here in Bethnal Green and Bow? If only my MP represented his constituents more diligently, surely he'd be able to extort considerably more cash from the Westminster gravy train. But he hasn't. George's financial timidity is a reflection of his political inactivity, and this makes me very angry indeed. MP's expenses - it's a scandal alright.
There's a lotofstuff going on in London this weekend. It's like all the organisers sat down at Christmas and thought "When's the optimum weekend of the summer? Must be the weekend with the longest day. Let's time our event for then, the weather's bound to be great." And the summersolstice flicks round just after dawn this Sunday, so there's an event pile-up either side. To help you to pick carefully, here are 20 highlights in dg's midsummer events guide.
Saturday only » Bank of England Open Door: Twice a year the Old Lady throws open her doors for a half-hour interior tour. See the Governor's Office, and the room where they decide mortgage rates, and explore the museum afterwards. The queues won't be as bad as for Open House Weekend in September, but better arrive early anyway (part of the City of London Festival, which kicks off today) » Henry VIII's Tudor River Pageant: Watch 500-year-old Hal ride up the Thames from the Tower [10am] to Hampton Court [3pm] (approx flotilla timings here), then join his Coronation Knees-up within the royal palace (admission £18) (feasting continues Sunday) » The Big Event (& Tea Dance): celebrations, processions and carnivality to mark the reopening of renovated Camberwell Park [2pm-7pm] (includes "mass ukulele jam") » Tottenham Carnival: Parade [11am] then festivities [from noon] in Bruce Castle Park » Proactive Festival: Interactive sports and cycling round the Emirates Stadium [noon-6pm] (bring an under-stimulated child) » Croxley Green Revels: A Metro-land tradition that stretches back to 1952, as immortalised by Betjeman (I've been, several times)
Saturday and Sunday » Paradise Gardens: annual arty pleasure garden in Victoria Park, featuring circus big top, tea dances, a shed-sized nightclub, live music, Carter's Steam Fair, a village fete, Pearly Queens, street theatre, sideshows, beer and the Ken Fox Wall of Death(always delightfully diverse) (2007 report) » Street Pianos: A plot to place tinkly instruments on street corners. The 15 City of London pianos should be in place this weekend, with 15 more appearing a bit further out next week (but not much further out) » Story of London lectures: Two solid days of historical London lectures, at King's Place (the lectures cost £9.50 each, or £60 for all 12, which is a bit steep I reckon) » Hendon Pageant: Remembering 1944 at the RAF Museum, with all sorts of re-enactments and historic vehicles (try to arrive via wartime-bedecked Colindale tube station) (& there's a Battle of Britain flypast at ten to four on Sunday afternoon) » A Grand Victorian Fayre: Polo, pig-sticking, soldiers and dance, in the grounds of Kenwood House [11:30am-4pm] » King Henry's Tudor Joust: More Coronation+500 festivities, this time with knights on horseback, in the grounds of Eltham Palace (admission £12) » Waterloo Weekend: English Heritage are recreating Wellington's famous battle with vegetables, at Apsley House, as well as doing some more normal historical stuff (11am-5pm) (admission £7) » Bow Arts Trust Open Studios: My local artist collective invites you to see their warren-like workspace [1pm-5pm] » Taste of London: Gourmet foodie nibbles in Regent's Park (at a price)
Today's puzzles are about separating digits. [Please don't stick any of the answers in the comments box, and no blatant hints please, but do tell us how you get on]
Look at this row of digits.
There's one digit between the two 1s, there are two digits between the two 2s, and there are three digits between the two 3s.
Got the idea?
Separation puzzle (1) Now try the same thing, but using two 1s, two 2s, two 3s and two 4s. Start by making sure there are four digits between the two 4s.
Separation puzzle (2) Now try the same thing, but using two 0s, two 1s, two 2s, two 3s and two 4s.
Separation puzzle (3) Finally, try the same thing using pairs of 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s and 7s.
Yesterday's Digital Britainreport hid a nasty surprise. Radio's changing, forever. Prepare to throw your old sets away.
THE DIGITAL RADIO UPGRADE DECISION At the heart of our vision is the delivery of a Digital Radio Upgrade programme by the end of 2015. The Digital Radio Upgrade will be implemented on a single date, which will be announced at least two years in advance. On the determined date all services carried on the national and local DAB multiplexes will cease broadcasting on analogue.
Normally listen to Radio 4 on an old transistor? Not any more. Listen to Classic FM in the car? Not on your current set. Wake up to the local breakfast show on your bedside clock radio? Not in the future. All the stations you currently listen to will be migrating from FM to DAB, so if you don't have a digital radio you'll not be able to listen. Upgrade, or lose out.
Don't panic, because this Radio Upgrade isn't yet a definite done deal. It's only a strong recommendation, and it's dependent on two criteria being met:
1) When 50% of listening is to digital; and 2) When national DAB coverage is comparable to FM coverage, and local DAB reaches 90% of the population and all major roads.
But it's the government's intention that both of these migration criteria should be met by the end of 2013, and that means 2015 (at the very latest) for analogue radio switch-off.
There'll be plenty of other ways to access radio by 2015, of course. Digital radio's already accessible on digital TV, and online, and on DAB radios, with these media apparently already accounting for a quarter of all radio listening. In the future your mobile phone will probably be DAB-enabled, and there's bound to be a radio-friendly iPod at some point. But I suspect that a large proportion of the UK population are going to take a lot of persuading to make the switch.
The main challenge to a successful Digital Radio Upgrade is not converting the avid radio listener, who has in many cases already embraced DAB, but the occasional radio listener. Recent research showed that 52% of listeners had not changed their main household radio to DAB because they were “quite happy with my existing radio.”
I could listen to the radio on my television, but I almost never do. I prefer to use my TV to watch rather than listen, and it always seems a complete waste of electricity to light up a big screen for no particularly good reason. I could listen to the radio on my computer, but I almost never do. I don't want an extra window swallowing valuable bandwidth, and I don't need additional sounds blaring out of tinny speakers when the internet's full of noise anyway. And I could listen to the radio on my Pure maplewood digital radio box, but I only get decent reception in one corner of one room which restricts listening somewhat, and the sound quality's not as good as FM isit?
Instead my home listening revolves around good old analogue. I wake up in the morning to an Argos clock radio circa 1987. I get ready for work to the sounds of a ghetto blaster circa 1991. While I'm in the kitchen, I rely on an ancient music centre circa 1983. And in the living room, when I want to listen to the radio in proper stereo through a decent set of speakers, I switch on my faithful hi-fi circa 1996. Works well enough for me. But come 2016 all of these radios are going to be useless, and I can either keep them as heritage instruments for listening to cassettes and CDs, or it's down the tip with them.
We must ensure the environmental impact of any significant analogue radio disposal is minimised through a responsible disposal and recycling strategy.
I'm not going to be left bereft of radio, obviously, but it's going to cost money to regain the same penetration that radio has in my life today. And I'm almost certainly amongst the better-prepared digitally to cope with this upcoming revolution. Imagine trying to persuade every household in the country that every one of their old analogue radios needs to be binned and replaced. Shiny push-button boxes for all, in your bedroom, in your living room and in your car. Radio penetration could be taking one big step back just so that radio can take a very big step forward.
If listeners are to adopt DAB they must be convinced it offers significant benefits over analogue. DAB should deliver new niche services, such as a dedicated jazz station, and gain better value from existing content, such as live coverage of Premiership football or uninterrupted coverage from music festivals.
You may be thinking "Bring it on." You're a cutting-edge blog-reading online adopter, and embracing the drive to digital isn't going to worry you. You may be thinking "I want greater choice and wider diversity and improved functionality and a hugely enhanced radio spectrum." Yeah, me too. But I don't relish an enforced move to a new digital platform, making all my existing equipment obsolete, just so that the FM spectrum can be parcelled up for a variety of temporary "ultra-local" services. And I suspect I'm not alone.
The northeasternmost station on the London Underground isn't in London and it isn't underground. It's at Epping, in Essex, and you have to travel to the farthest tip of the Central line to reach it. There used to be three stations even further out, at North Weald, BlakeHall and Ongar, but this section of the line was woefullyunder-used and closed down in 1994. A bunch of diesel-friendly volunteers are working on reopening the extra bit, for weekend pleasure rides at least, but for the time being Epping's as far as you can get.
Epping remains a popularstation, not least with commuters across several square miles of surrounding countryside, which is why alongside platform 1 is the second largest station car park on the entire network. Drive up the hill and turn left, past a selection of leafy suburban retreats, and you can be in the main HighStreet in a couple of minutes. It's a broad and pleasant thoroughfare all told, dominated by the tall Gothic tower of St John's parish church, and with enough grassy interludes to give the place a bit of character. There are perhaps too many coffee shops, I thought, but the orange-fronted bakery looked rather inviting, and the independent EppingBookshop added extra literary appeal. The local butchers sell Epping sausages, which are famous apparently, although I can't say I've ever tasted any. At the southern end of the High Street stands the town's brick Victorian water tower, now topped off by a collection of mobile phone transmitters. And beyond that is the edge ofEppingForest. It's easy to see why people might want to live here.
That's Epping, Essex, population eleven thousand. But there are several other Eppings around the world, including twosuburbs in Australia each with a population greater than the English town, plus another in Cape Town, South Africa. There's even an Epping in Maine, in the easternmost county of the easternmost state of the USA, although that Epping's rather smaller. It's not so much a two-horse town as a one-dog street corner, home to a few far-flung neighbours spread out along a wooded backroad. The nearest small town has a population of 459, that's how small the American Epping is. Not somewhere I'd ever dream of visiting, let alone blogging about, because I suspect there wouldn't be much to say.
But that's not going to stop Geoff. He's visiting Epping ME today, at the start of a madcap ten-week hurtle around the good old US of A. You may remember Geoff as the former holder of the Guinness World Record for visiting all the stations on the London Underground in the shortest possible time. Five years ago he and his friend Neil visited all 275 stations (including Epping) in 18 hours, 35 minutes and 43 seconds, and earned themselves a cheap-looking certificate for their troubles. Their record lasted only a couple of years before being snatched away, by which time Geoff had moved to America and the opportunity to grab it back had slipped away.
So now Geoff's trying something similar, and yet completely different, on the other side of the Atlantic. He's attempting to visit 48 American locations with the same name as an underground station, one in each of the 48 contiguous states. A ridiculous idea, obviously, but one for which I bear considerable responsibility as I suggested it to him in the first place. Sorry Geoff.
His grand tube tour is entitled Underground : USA, and he's hoping to complete it all by the end of August. He's driving all umpteen thousand miles in a borrowed automobile, and he's blogging the entire journey with video, text, progress maps and copiousTwitterage. There might even be a film documentary later, you never know. Geoff's first stop is today in Epping, then second stop Putney, then careering onwards through Plaistow, White City and Watford, to name but a few.
It's the sort of bonkers thing I'd love to try, if only I could drive and had three months spare and didn't mind sleeping in motels or endless camping or eating appallingly. But no, I shall have to observe Geoff's tube journey virtually, as can you if you'd like to follow how his road trip pans out. Facebookers can tag along here, I believe, or else the main webpage is on Geoff's usual site here. I'm not sure how anyone could ever make Epping, Maine, sound interesting, but I'm sure he'll manage...
One of the downsides to moving house ten years ago was that I had to replace my driving licence. New address, new document required. Bad timing, as it turned out, because I became one of the first mainstream UK drivers to require an EU-approved photocard licence. Not fun, given that I was up to my knees in packing boxes and didn't really have the time for this additional level of hassle. I eventually managed to find a photo booth in Small Local Town, decided I could semi-tolerate the image it churned out, then sent everything off and waited eagerly for all the necessary documentation to be returned. Sorted, I thought. Hassle over.
But no. The smaller-than-usual smallprint on the back of my new driving licence hid a nasty surprise, which was that my photocard driving licence is only vaild for 10 years. Far from being a document for life, it actually expires within the next month, at "midnight precisely", after which time I could be landed with a £1000 fine if I attempt to use it. Ouch.
I was alerted to this unfortunate state of affairs when the DVLA sent me a reminder letter, which informed me that there were three things I must do to renew my licence, or else I'd have to surrender it. First I had to get myself a new photo, then I had to post back all my existing documents, and then I had to pay for the privilege. Damn. And grrr.
The rules for acceptable photographs appear to have been tightened up since 1999 and now match the draconian requirements required for a new passport. No redeye, no grinning, no teeth. Look natural, but not too natural. No hats, no burkhas, no sunglasses. Whatever you do don't blink. No blur, no shadow, no coloured backgrounds. Must be taken "in the last month", annoyingly, so no retrieving those three spare photos I had left over from a similar request last year, they won't do. And finally the bureaucratically precise demand that the head (from top to chin) must fill "at least 29mm and no more than 34mm" of the 45mm frame. Rulers at the ready.
There's no chance of meeting this list of requirements whilst sat in a photo booth, not without wasting huge amounts of money on not-quite-acceptable attempts. Equally, even though almost everyone has a digital camera these days, few of us would be able to take and print out a perfectly proportioned photo that'd keep the DVLA pedants happy. Sigh.
So I had to hunt down of those professional studio places where someone takes your photo for you. They're not easy to find, even in the middle of a large capital city, so goodness knows how much harder it'd be if I were still living in Small Local Town. I eventually found a bloke in a tiny shop in the subway arcade above Charing Cross tube station (opposite entrance number 9, if you ever need something similar). He sat me in precisely the right place, and did a test shot first to ensure my face was the right height, and made certain I was looking straight at the camera in an appropriate manner, and printed out everything in five minutes flat, and only charged me just under a fiver for the lot. OK, so I still look like a swivel-eyed loon in the photo, and I have seven spare copies I shall almost certainly never need, but the DVLA will be satisfied and I shall have ten years of quiet.
Having attached my mugshot to the form, I now have to enclose a processing fee. And blimey, it's a bit steep. The DVLA are charging £20 for this update, and it's pay up every ten years or else lose out. They're also insisting that payment be made either by cheque or postal order, which sounds like they haven't moved on financially since 1999. I can barely remember the last time I used my cheque book - indeed it's taken me quite a while to work out where it was.
And now I have to entrust my old driving licence to the ultra-secure couldn't-possibly-go-missing Royal Mail, and I mustn't forget to stick a stamp on the envelope provided. Alternatively there's the option to deliver the form by hand direct to a DVLA local office, but there are only three of those in London (in Wimbledon, Borehamwood and Sidcup), one of which isn't even in London, none of which is in any way convenient. And then, fingers crossed, all that remains is to await the return of upgraded identity documents by return of post. Total cost £25.25.
So be warned, if you've got a photo card driving licence, your ten-year expiry date may come round sooner than you expect. Check the smallprint on the back of your card, or await the reminder letter from the DVLA, and be prepared to get your photo taken. Don't smile please.
Mile End update Story so far: weekend engineering works, ticket hall shut, platforms open. Early attempts at information dissemination: poor (occasionally very poor)
1)Saturday morning, outside Mile End station: Entrance closed, apart from a small gap through which ladders and paint and stuff could be seen in the stairwell down to the ticket hall. » Crowd of lost souls outside station: small, but steady
Sign immediately to right of station entrance: "Station closed" (& big no entry sign) (WIN) Further instructions on sign: "Nearest alternative stations Bow Road, Bow Church, Stepney Green" (& instructions on how to get to these stations on the 25 bus) (WIN?) » Mention that it might/would be quicker to walk: nil (FAIL) » Mention of 425 bus for getting to Bow Road and Bow Church: nil (FAIL)
Sign immediately to left of entrance: "No entry to station on 6/7, 13/14 and 27/28 June. See red banners for alternative routes." » Number of red banners visible from outside station: 0 (FAIL) » Number of red banners previously on wall just inside station entrance but which had been taken down so that the wall could be redecorated: 1 (ÜBER-FAIL)
Conversation with member of staff standing outside station entrance: "So, where's the red banners then?" "Sorry, they took those down. That makes me the red banner, I guess. You want to walk to Bow Road, it's five minutes that way." (BIG WIN)
2)Saturday morning, inside Mile End station: lots of workmen in sealed-off ticket hall wearing helmets with Mickey Mouse-sized ear defenders, ticket gates covered over, walls covered over, activity level high. » Crowd of lost souls on platform: none
Sign on platform at foot of stairs: "No exit to street" (& big red crossed-out pedestrian) (WIN) Further instructions on sign: "Take any train to the next station and use local bus services to return to Mile End" (LAZY FAIL)
Time taken to take train to next station and use local bus services to return to Mile End... ...to Stratford: 3m (train) + 3m (interchange) + 6m (average wait) + 17m (bus) = 29 mins ...to Bethnal Green: 2m (train) + 3m (interchange) + 4m (average wait) + 8m (bus) = 17 mins ...to Stepney Green: 2m (train) + 1m (interchange) + 3m (average wait) + 4m (bus) = 10 mins ...to Bow Road: 1m (train) + 1m (interchange) + 3m (average wait) + 3m (bus) = 8 mins
» Number of minutes potentially wasted by following advice on poster: 21 (FAIL)
Announcement by man on platform as train pulls in: "Customers for Mile End should take an eastbound District line train to Bow Road and return to Mile End at street level" (WIN)
3)Attempt to use online journey planner to plan journey from Bethnal Green to Mile End... » Start: Bethnal Green Underground Station » Take: the Central Line » Average journey time: 2 minutes » End: Mile End Underground station » MILE END STATION: Saturday 13 and Sunday 14 June, open for interchange, only. Passengers are not able to exit or enter the station. (TOTAL FAIL)
4)Announcements on trains approaching Mile End: word perfect (WIN)
Moral of story: don't trust anything you read on the Underground, just listen to the staff.
For the second part of my stroll through "bits of Bow that didn't exist eight summers ago", I'm crossing the A12 and heading back down the eastern side. There are five more photos, which you can see a bit bigger by clicking on them. And I will of course be ending up somewhere rather famous.
The EastCrossRoute sliced through Bow in the early 1970s, and the community's been trying to join up the two sides ever since. Here in Old Ford is one of the few crossings, a 21st century footbridge designed to make Fish Island a slightly more accessible outpost to reach. It's a simple yet elegant hump, passing through a twisted ring of steel at its highest point, with separate (disregarded) lanes for pedestrians and bikes. To the west there's a grid of terraced houses plus corner shops and kids on bikes, while to the east there's a big yellow warehouse and a converted chapel and industrial bleakness. And viewable from the top, the steady stream of through traffic that created this social chasm in the first place. The first minor battle has been won. [map]
I fear that, one day, everybody in London will live in a tiny compartment on the site of something more interesting. Here's a case in point. This is Wick Lane, until recently a sidelined industrial outpost, before property developers deduced that high-rise living was worth far more than low-profit manufacturing. This pink-based block (on the site of a former dyeworks) was first to arise five years ago, its early residents isolated in the middle of social nowhere. The brochure for 417 Riverside (still available) promised "urban riverside living" (conveniently ignoring the sewer nextdoor) and offered "an attractive and accessible location" (maybe one day, definitely not yet). The neighbouring block appeared last year on the site ofa newspaper ink factory - the end result a blandgrey cuboid. Nah, sooner you than me. [map]
And the upgrade continues. The southern half of FishIsland, the chunk where the streets aren't named after dace, roach or bream, is (very) slowly evolving from grimy backwater to residential bubble. Making stuff is so very 20th century, so all the local jobs and places of employment are gradually shifting elsewhere. Come back in a few years and the JCBs will have moved on, the van hire yard will have disappeared and that boarded-up warehouse will have realised the potential of its residential footprint. Tomorrow's Islanders will be happiest working from home in their broadband-enabled studios, but they'll have to get their cars fixed somewhere else. Pack 'em in, pile 'em high, and erase all the stuff that made the area interesting in the first place. [map]
The northern half of Fish Island retains a little more character. Tower Hamlets recently slapped a conservation area around Dace Road, so this enclave of artist-packed warehouses and old factories (mmm, Percy's peanuts) should survive relatively unscathed. This photo shows the more modern Ironworks building, tightly squeezed into the courtyard of the feature it replaced. It's built right up close to the Greenway, access to which ought to be a simple hop off a balcony, but the site's single gated front entrance forces residents to make an unexpectedly lengthy detour. Expect the BBC or some other international TV company to take over the penthouse suite in three years time, because it's probably the very closest viewpoint to the final stop on my journey. [map]
A short stroll along the Greenway and there it is, the building that's acting as a catalyst for all this change in the surrounding borderlands. The newly-sprung Olympic Stadium is proving to be an irresistible magnet not just for sport but also for investment. There'll even be new homes erected right here, immediately in front of the stadium, come the post-Games legacy phase. As London's population grows, an even greater proportion of us are going to end up living in buildings that didn't exist at the turn of the century. Most of the new architecture I've passed on my walk would have sprung up anyway, but 2012 means that far more will follow in its wake. Olympic ripples are changing my neighbourhood, almost beyond recognition. [map]
[Part 1, up the western side of the A12, was yesterday]
I went for a walk around the block yesterday. Quite a big block, from my home in Bow up one side of the A12 and down the other. And I was struck by quite how much new stuff there was. Things that weren't there when I moved to London eight years ago, but are now an integral part of the landscape. So I took some photos of some of the new stuff, which you can see a bit bigger by clicking on them, and I've written down a few thoughts. London's a-changing, some parts faster than others.
The Bow Flyover used to be the one of the tallest things around here, but not any more. A whopping great apartment block's been erected alongside, one of a chain along the Olympic borderline into Stratford, and still they come. This tower was only due to have nine storeys when the original planning permission went through, but greed and speculation raised it higher, and now there's a semi-let village hanging in the sky. In its shadow lurks a drive-in greasemonger selling stodge and fries, not an option eight years ago, but more than popular today. Rumour has it the local Baptist church may soon be reinstated alongside, no doubt slightly richer than before. Round here red and silver has replaced brown and grey, and there's no going back. [map]
Grove Hall Park's my local greenspace. It's nothing special, but its handful of grassy acres are more than pleasant all the same. The council's poured a load of money into the park over the last couple of years, sprucing up the memorial garden and adding a decent (and well-used) playground. There are tumbly slides for toddlers, geometric frames for kids and twin hoops for teens - a big improvement on the lacklustre selection on site before. Even the brightly painted garden wall has so far resisted the attention of the E3 spray-tagger posse. With fresh tower blocks poking up above a leafy canopy, this is the photo that most looks like it's an illustration from a town planner's brochure. I still can't quite believe it's real. [map]
Where did that shop come from? I'm sure last time I walked up Fairfield Road this was just an industrial unit awaiting rebirth, and suddenly it's a brand new convenience store. The people of BowQuarter used to cope perfectly well with their own internal mini-market, but now there's another huge estate on the opposite side of the road it seems an additional shop can be supported. Its shelves are piled not-quite-high with lowest common denominator comestibles, with alcohol and fizzy drinks ranking higher in importance on the boards outside than fruit, bread and vegetables. Don't expect organic splendour, this is still the East End after all, and a packet of Haribo and some Lucozade will do quite well enough for many. [map]
Here's change in action. A nine-storey "contemporary development" is in the ascendant, but for now all you can do is pop into the sales centre and look at some pictures. Disappointingly the sales centre is based in a proper brick house (once the offices of HF Bates recycling yard), now hidden away behind enormous advertising banners, and a building with far more character than the pile of shiny boxes that'll replace it. Even worse, some marketing guru has labelled the entire project "Mojo", and has written some of the most complete tosh I've ever read to try and promote it. "Mojo is right where you want to be", apparently. Alas this end of Bow isn't "vibrant, full of contrasts and distinctly cosmopolitan", but is instead rapidly losing its soul to heritage-free building sites such as this. [map]
Not all redevelopment is bad. The area east of Parnell Road used to be covered by Soviet-style council blocks, and then the demolition teams moved in, and then the showhomes went up, and now there's an entire new community on site. At the heart is a long oblong green, with two giant poppies spouting in the centre, beneath which two- and four-legged friends hang out. Medium-sized flats surround the perimeter, each named after a god or goddess, and each with their respective cartoon image beaming down from the front wall. It's not quite so delightful beyond, where a solid ¼-mile wall of apartments flanks a roaring dual carriageway, dotted with tiny east-facing windows to keep the traffic noise at bay. The estate's brand new road network is considerably quieter. E3's local map is never static. [map]
[And tomorrow, back down the other side of the A12]
Forgive me, while there's a tube strike on, for looking ahead to next weekend's network closures. But I'd like to focus today on my nearly-local station, Mile End, which is a transport node in sore need of interior upgrade. The station's a real mess inside, and has been for a couple of years, because all the tiles were ripped down immediately before Metronet went bust. There's been no money to replace the tiles since, and the end result is pig-uglyplatforms and grim-looking passageways. But a few tentative tiles have now materialised on various boarded-up pillars, and this month work has finally begun on renovating the ticket hall. It's this latter activity which requires part of the station to be closed over several weekends.
So, the situation is this. The entrance to Mile End station will be closed over the weekends 6/7 June, 13/14 June and 27/28 June. Down below, the station will still be open to allow passengers to change lines.
Simple, you'd have thought. But not to TfL, who've been busy hiding away different chunks of this information like a jigsaw in the hope that passengers might be able to piece them all together and work out what's going on. Where shall we start?
1) Let's start on the TfL live travel news webpage. Check the tab for planned engineering works this weekend and see if you can spot anything. Central line good service, District line good service. Nothing obvious there. But click on the 'tube stations' tab to the left of the map and you might deduce that something's up. Mile End's not on the list of closed stations, but it is there under 'station maintenance'. Normally this list is ignorable, detailing nothing more serious than out-of-work escalators and reduced lift services. This time, however, it bears essential news for the residents of western E3:
Saturday 13 and Sunday 14 June, open for interchange, only. Passengers are not able to exit or enter the station. The nearest alternative stations are Bow Road, Stepney Green, Bethnal Green and Stratford. The ticket office is closed.
That's very useful information, but it's incredibly well hidden and took three clicks to find. So let's assume that nobody's going to notice it.
2) Secondly then, TfL's weekly Weekend line and station closures email. It comes round every Wednesday, to subscribers only, and this week's has full details of the Mile End closure. Doesn't it?
Central line: Mile End station is available to change between the District and Hammersmith & City lines only. There is no entry or exit from the station. For further details and alternative routes, please click here.
Sounds good, but the first sentence is actually wrong, as this subsequent entry indicates.
Hammersmith & City line: There is no service on the entire line due to track replacement work. For further details and alternative routes, please click here.
The Hammersmith and City line is one of two to be completely closed this weekend, so all that talk of Mile End being "available to change between the District and Hammersmith & City lines only" was untrue. Here's the mistake repeated for good measure.
District line: Mile End station is available to change between the Central and Hammersmith & City lines only. There is no entry or exit from the station. For further details and alternative routes, please click here.
And what happens if you click on the link for further details and alternative routes. Nothing in any way helpful, as it turns out. You get a whopping great page of pdf, but all it actually says is this:
Mile End station is undergoing improvement work. No entry or exit. The station is open for interchange between lines only. Please use alternative bus and walking routes where possible. Your journey could take up to 15 minutes extra.
I'm not sure which of those five sentences is supposed to provide "further details". Maybe the 15 minutes bit. And there's absolutely nothing useful about alternative routes to help you replan your journey either. If you're standing outside a closed Mile End station this weekend, what is the best way to get yourself on a District or Central line train. No clues here. Sorry, that's pretty rubbish.
3) So, finally, what about the information being presented at Mile End station itself. Well, there's a big red banner hung above the steps just inside the station entrance, and here's what it says:
Now that looks like lots of useful detail, including all the relevant buses needed to reach to the nextdoor stations. But what's not mentioned is how far away the stations are, nor that walking might be a sensible alternative. On the District line, for example, Bow Road's twice as close as Stepney Green, and can be reached on foot in six minutes flat. As for the two Central line alternatives, the suggested bus journey to each station takes is timetabled to take more than 15 minutes. You might even find it quicker to walk up to Bow Road and tube back to Mile End to change to the Central line there. So why are they insisting that you take the bus?
And there's one really important word missing on that banner, and that's "closed". Reading through all this lot it's not immediately obvious that passengers won't be able to enter the station from the street, it's all inferred. There are some text-lite posters within the station itself which announce the "No entry" news, but this isn't a terribly joined-up campaign.
Ticket hall shut, platforms open, it shouldn't be rocket science to explain. I hope that Mile Enders manage to decipher the message for themselves this weekend.
When the Olympics arrive in town, organising officials are going to try to persuade you to arrive at the stadium via West Ham station. Don't listen to them. They need to spread the spectator load over across many stations as possible, so well-connected West Ham's a major part of the 2012 transport plan. According to some wildly optimistic forecast, as many as 18% of spectators are expected to enter the park this way. But gullible attendees expecting a nice short stroll to the Olympic Park are in for an unpleasant surprise. It's more than a mile from West Ham station to the Olympic Stadium, and the intervening walk is via a whiffy Victorian sewer. Don't say I didn't warn you.
There's not a lot that 2012 bosses can do to move West Ham nearer to the stadium, but they are busy attempting to make the intervening walk as pleasant as possible. The path follows the Greenway, the northeastern outfall of London's 150-year-old sewage system, which is already cunningly disguised by having a big broad footpath on top. Not the loveliest of footpaths, admittedly, more a rough tarmac strip with a featureless edging of bland grass. But a pleasant enough way of getting from Ato B (especially if B is Bow or Beckton), and an ideal cycling route with fine views across surrounding Newham. Functional certainly, but world-class definitely not.
So an upgrade is called for. The plans are to lay two adjacent parallel paths with differing surfaces, one for bikes and one for pedestrians. Materials recycled from building on the site of the Olympic Park will be used, such as bricks, manhole covers, bollards and granite cobbles. Think of these paths as doubling up as some sort of industrial heritage collage. Try not to think of them as the crushed remnants of former businesses destined to be forever trampled underfoot. Whatever, they'll only take up about half of the Greenway's width, leaving plenty of space on either side for transplanted environmental greenspace. We're promised plenty of wildflower meadows along the way, as well as pockets of maple, hawthorn and hazel. It may not be quite so endearingly bland as the current surface, but it should give trudging Olympic spectators something rather lovelier to look at.
And the upgrade is already underway. All along the Greenway from Stratford High Street to West Ham, half of the sewertop carriageway has been fenced off and contractors are busy removing the grass and other vegetation. Some of the plants will be harder to remove than others. Printed signs attached to orange netting reveal several clusters of Japanese knotweed along the railings, and there's also a big clump of offensive giant hogweed close to the sewage pumping station. Best they're removed before they strangle any future planting, and before any Japanese tourists pass by in 2012 with a disapproving look. There's quite a lot of stripping still to go, and then presumably the other half of the carriageway will have to receive the same treatment.
It seems strange seeing workmen and portakabins on the Greenway, so long a forgotten backwater track used by not many to get nowhere special. And it's a shame to see the path's previous infrastructure uprooted and discarded in an undignified heap [photo]. The Greenway's signposts used to be chunky vandalproof ironwork with all the names carved out in holey lettering. This wouldn't have passed muster in any design competition, but it was bold and resilient, and above all very green. Maybe they'll carve up all the old signs and benches and then recycle recognisable chunks amongst the new footpath, but somehow I doubt it. At least the replacement signs appear to have a bit of character about them too, whenever they finally appear.
Nobody would be spending any money on the Greenway were it not for the Olympics and the need to funnel spectators securely to and from distant transport links. Indeed, anybody living down at the Plaistow or Beckton end of the Greenway will see no difference whatsoever for the foreseeable future because that's not an Olympic priority. But I'm hopeful that the end result from West Ham northwards will be rather lovelier, not least because it'll considerably enhance my regular walk from home to BestMate's house.
Just don't any of you lot make an inadvertent visit to the upgraded scenic Greenway during the 2012 Games, else you'll face a surprisingly lengthy walk to get from the station to the perimeter of the Park. The wild flowers will be pretty, but the trudge to your security friskdown may be interminable. Remember to travel to the Olympics via Stratford, never via West Ham. You'll thank me for that piece of advice one day.
LONDON A-Z An alphabetical journey through the capital's museums Kew Bridge Steam Museum
Location: Green Dragon Lane, Brentford, TW8 0EN [map] Open: 11am-4pm (closed Mondays) Admission: £9.50 Brief summary: steam, water and grease Website:www.kbsm.org Time to set aside: at least half a day
Every now and then my alphabetical journey throws up a museum I can't believe I haven't been to before. This is one of those. Formerly one of London's most important pumping stations, the Kew Bridge Steam Museum is now a hybridhotchpotch of industrial heritage, machine room and engine shed. It's located by the Thames between Brentford and Chiswick, beneath a giant standpipetower visible for miles around. And hidden within are some absolutely whacking great steam engines. The Industrial Revolution wasn't powered by electricity, oh no, it was much harder work than that.
Quick bit of historical background. The Grand Junction Waterworks Company was formed 200 years ago to supply London with canal-sourced drinking water. This proved somewhat unhygienic so they soon switched their sights to the Thames, constructing a waterworks in Chelsea near the mouth of the Westbourne sewer. Not much better, obviously, so in 1838 they upped sticks to Kew Bridge and piped in cleaner water from midstream. When the building was decommissioned after WW2 the old engines were preserved in case anybody ever raised enough money to turn them into a museum. And they did, so they are.
The museum smells of grease and old rags, which is perhaps not surprising because they're what keep the place together. Every now and then a boiler-suitedvolunteer will scuttle in through one door and out through another, maybe to give some flange somewhere a good oil, or maybe for a well-deserved cup of tea. If you're lucky he's here to fire up one of the engines, so be patient, it could take a while to build up sufficient head of steam. Listen carefully to his enthusiastic commentary and you might learn a fair amount about rotative motion, crankshafts and piston rods. And the threeoldmachines in the central Steam Hall may look large and impressive, but they're some of the smaller beasts that run on site.
Nextdoor are three muchbigger machines, sufficiently tall that you can climb various sets of stairs to view them at beam, cylinder or engine level. On the day of my visit only the Boulton & Wattengine, an 1820 survivor transplanted from Chelsea, was being demonstrated. While one volunteer gave us a rundown of the museum's history, his colleague flipped various levers with rhythmicprecision until the mechanism ran steadily without human intervention. Above our heads a 15 ton beam rose, tripped and fell, forcing several gallons of water into a pondlike sump below. Such majestic power once helped to keep parts of London's water supply cholera-free.
Along another corridor, crammed within a pair of narrow yet lofty brick chambers, stand the museum's CornishEngines. One of these is the world's largest surviving single cylinder beam engine, and the other is the largest working beam engine in the world. Not bad for suburban Brentford. Again there's up-close access on three floors (but this time climbing to the top deck alongside the twin beams gave me an unexpected attack of vertigo). They're both monstrous and magnificent, even when stationary, with pipes and cylinders agleam. Add in venting steam and thrusting rods, on the rare occasions the 90 inch engine is actually fired up, and the experience is one to remember.
Follow the right path downstairs in this maze of a building and you'll find the Water For Life Gallery - a relatively modern display which details the history of water supply and usage in London. Not the sort of attraction you'd normally travel miles to see, and not quite the "fascinating story" the museum's literature promises, but interesting enough if you've ever wondered why the stuff that gushes out of your household tap doesn't kill you. I liked the lengthy wall collage comprising a century of domestic appliances, from hip bath via washing machine to foot spa. There were also special interactive bits for kids, including a robot sewercam and a twirly filtration jar, although nothing that could complete with the steaming whirring engines elsewhere.
And there's more. A 400 yard steam railway operates around the edge of the site (the only fully operational steam railway in London) and visitors can hop on the back for a lightchug through the backyard. I was hoping for a ride on the last train before lunch, but the rear carriages were 90% full of excited families who didn't look like they'd appreciate an obvious non-Dad squeezing in. Instead I made do looking at a stationary waterwheel, and nosing into some deserted workshops, and listening to the history of the standpipe tower via an old telephone.
Time your visit carefully. Not all of the old engines are in steam every day, indeed many are open on special occasions only. Weekdays tend to be quiet, and Sundays tend to have more going on than Saturdays. The last weekend of the month is usually the best time to visit, although watch out for various extra events at other times (model railway shows, wartime reconstructions, Meccano rallies, that sort of thing).
And keep your ticket. Entrance may be fairly pricey but admission lasts for twelve months, so if one particular engine's not running you can come back on another day when it is. Who knows, you might even decide you like the place so much that you sign up as a volunteer, and then you can come back and get your hands greasy whenever you like. I won't be going quite that far, but I'll certainly be giving my ticket another outing. by train: Kew Bridgeby tube: Gunnersburyby bus: 65, 237, 267, 391
The first "big weekend" of the Story of London festival concludes today. It's the Walking Weekend, during which Londoners are invited to "discover the city on foot to uncover the secret histories of the capital's streets, with over 100 guided walks". [walking weekend walks][Sunday events]
I'm sure that many people have been out enjoying Boris's "glorious celebration of London's past, present and future", although perhaps the threat of rain is deterring some from attending as many events as planned. So I'm continuing to invite my readers to tell me all about their SoL exploits. If you go on a festival walk or attend any festival event, or if you've already been, please write me a brief report and I'll publish it here on the blog. 150 words max, preferably emailed, and if you want to attach a photo all the better. Updates throughout the weekend, just as soon as they start flooding in.
1)Caroline attended a walk with Blue Badge Tourist Guide Jackie Stater The guided walk around Deptford, 'Sovereigns, Sailors, Shipwrights and Skulls', was excellent. Genuinely a special event for the festival, it was led by a Blue Badge guide who really knows the area and conveyed the rich history of the place as well as its current artistic activity. Ranging from the Creek to the High Street, from a thirteenth-century church tower to Herzog & De Meuron's Laban Centre, this was the perfect riposte to those (Daily Mail, I'm looking at you) who insist that Deptford is nothing but a crime-ridden slum. Best of all, the rain stayed away!
2)Martin attended the 'Heart of Hackney' walk with Blue Badge Tourist Guide Mary Sewell It seems that Hackney has more stories than you'd realise. I pass through the area often, but don't often stop to consider them. Blue Badge guide Mary took us around buildings we knew well around the centre of Hackney and Lower Clapton - the Town Hall, the Hackney Empire, St John's Church and the Round Chapel, telling us about the history behind them. She also pointed out details you might not normally spot, and well-hidden plaques revealing the old Manor House on what's now Mare Street, and the home of Joseph Priestly, who discovered Oxygen. Finishing off at Sutton House (a Tudor mansion that the National Trust seem unsure what to do with) she revealed that it was named after the founder of the Charterhouse School, Thomas Sutton - before it was discovered that he never lived there. Not all is as it seems round these parts. Martin adds "only me and my girlfriend turned up for the 4.30 tour, and there was only one taker for the earlier one"
3) John attended the 'HQS Wellington Open Day' on the Thames 1pm on Sunday found me standing on the gangplank leading to the ship Wellington, permanently moored on the Thames Embankment, near Temple tube station. Having gone past this ship hundreds of time since 1947 when she arrived in London, I looked forward to seeing inside. You can read about the ships history on its website, so I'll shall just write about the visit experience. Once on board you sign in (health and safety). The tours are led by experts in their field, (one guide worked for Cunard). You go along many corridors and there are plenty of stairs. The view of London from the decks is great (it was high tide, that helped). You can try your hand to turn the ships wheel, signal the engine room etc. At the location of the ship's bell we were told that when you are on a ship and see the bell then run your fingers inside it, if a child is Christened at sea they use the bell to hold the water and engrave the name inside the bell. (Bet you didn’t know that!)
I'm sure that many of you will be out enjoying Boris's "glorious celebration of London’s past, present and future", so this weekend I'm inviting my readers to tell me all about it. If you go on a festival walk or attend any festival event, either today or tomorrow, please write me a brief report and I'll publish it here on the blog. 150 words max, preferably emailed, and if you want to attach a photo all the better. Updates throughout the weekend as your reports come in.
Big Brother (10) Freddie: How Jamiroquai might have turned out if he'd been born into money (grinning twat potential = high) Lisa: bouncy cropped anti-goddess with scarlet mohawk (collective lesbopunk potential = high) Sophie: blonde double-F wannabe-Page-Three stunna, with teeth brighter than her IQ (cheap stiletto centrefold potential = high) Kris: egocentric slim-suited Manc beardylad (likelihood of tantrums over lack of hair straighteners = low) Noirin: leggy down-to-earth chatterbox with face/accent mismatch (handbag circulatory dancer potential = high) Cairon: transatlantic primary-colored street-stalking bro knowwhatimsayin (ghetto skank potential = high) Angel: Russian six-pack-rippled Sportacus, lost in misguided artistic fantasy (mime-related trauma potential = high) Karly: Fearne Cotton, but with longer hair and Scottisher accent (WAG potential = not as high as she hopes) Marcus: muttonchop goth-hobbit (job offer as pony-tailed roadie = likely) Beinazir: sturdy over-tressed gold-tower (ease with which she can be heard jangling at fifty paces = high) Sophia: fierce little hair-straightened screecher (might've been cast in Diff'rent Strokes if the script had called for Arnold to be female) Rodrigo: annoyingly optimistic Brazilian grinny penpal (are yellow check shirts back in fashion? = unlikely) Charlie: token gelled-and pumped callcentre smileygay (vodka-swigging addiction potential = high) Saffia: abrasive mememe mother with a right trashmouth on her (after two minutes I can already guess why her last two relationships failed) Sree: focused over-keen Indian studentdrone (likelihood of doing whatever other people tell him = high) Siavash: lovechild of Jack Sparrow and John Lennon circa 1970, but without the talent (punchintheface potential = high)
Big Loser (Number 10) Gordon: dour beancounter billynomates evolved into national failmagnet (survival prospects = well ropey) Hazel: small chirping mammal felled by blind taxgreed oversight (return to grassroots = overdue) James: off-radar stalking horse firing bloodlust starting pistol (household name potential = minimal) Jacqui: discredited governess waddling back into Redditch shadows (cost of failure = bathplug + porn) Alan: inoffensive nicebloke who might lead to Labour to only slightly crushing defeat (historical significance = mere footnote) Mandy: Machiavellian schemer enjoying one last spell oiling wheels of government (number of nine lives used = at least seven) Alistair: tax-raising gloom-monger doomed to impotence by global collapse (financial sparkle = non-existent) Tony: retired NuLab colossus smirking from international sidelines (departure from political stage = perfectly timed) Nick: faceless political bystander wielding cloak of media invisibility (recognition by average UK punter = minimal) David: smarmy landed gentry in Right place at Right time (UK-ruling potential = inevitable)
Elections worry me. They're popularity contests, generally won by the party that appears more competent, not necessarily the party that is. Don't bother to engage with the big questions, just decide which party leader you'd rather invite round for dinner.
Politics worries me. It ought to be based on policies, but too often it's based on personality. He's nice, she looks like a cow, I don't like the way his eyebrows meet in the middle, she's a bit posh. Cross-party debate too often descends into a bitter slanging match, more destructive than constructive, and the fundamentals are overlooked. It's important to engage, but this is all terribly superficial.
Campaigns worry me. They're targeted at the lowest common denominator, reducing key concepts to mere soundbites. Dripfeed some vague promises, smear your opponent's reputation, but never commit your party to anything that might prove awkward later. The key aim appears to be to say absolutely nothing wrong, rather than attempting to put forward policies that are right.
Voters worry me. Much of the electorate has only the haziest idea about what politicians have pledged to do, except what their over-simplified newspaper has spoonfed them. Voters will put their cross next to anyone if they look clean and trustworthy, without a thought to the longer-term consequences for their future finances and freedom. Some people are so easily led.
Public opinion worries me. The voice of the majority isn't always the voice of common sense, especially when there's an emotive issue afoot. See that MP, she must be a criminal she must, well she's an MP, stands to reason. Put the electorate in charge of the country and you'd soon end up with a Minister of Repatriation And Hanging. The mob mentality in full effect is a very scary thing.
European Elections worry me. People are going out to vote today on things that affect all our futures, most of them without the slightest understanding of what they're voting for. All they're interested in are national issues and giving national figures a bloody nose, rather than considering the broader continental dimension. The ballot box can be so very parochial.
European Election results worry me. The MEPs elected this week will be deciding legislation until 2013, but we're picking them whilst obsessed by petty 2009 irregularities. As a result the UK risks sending bigots, zealots and racists to Brussels, and so allowing these fanatics a platform for their offensive views. And that's why I'm off to my local polling station on the way into work, to ensure that it's not my fault if they get in.
So, anyway, back to the Story of London festival website. It's changed a bit since Monday. For the better. And for the worse.
The biggest change is to the website's main search engine, specifically to how you "Find Your Nearest Event". On Monday you had to enter a postcode, and then a map appeared showing the surrounding events. Great if you wanted to search around your own home, but not much use elsewhere in London if you didn't know the postcode. It was also possible to view the results of your search as a list... except that the list showed every event in London, not just those on the map. And now that's changed.
Now you don't have to type in your postcode. Now you only have to type in a "location" of some sort, be it a place name, street name, postcode or neighbourhood. That's a major improvement, or so it would seem. Now it's possible to discover events around Great Portland Street, or along Highgate Hill, or out in Richmond, much more easily. You can even search for the middle of Regent's Park, and so discover this Sunday's Camden Green Fair (...ah, except the event's been cancelled, and the SoL website hasn't realised). Better news - search for Crossness and you'll now be able to discover precisely when the Engines are open, which is a big improvement on Monday.
But there's a downside. Search for Hendon and a event-less map appears. Sorry, announces the website, but "There are no events in your area. Please enter another area or use the events calendar..." Untrue. There is a big Story of London event in Hendon - the Hendon Pageant at RAF Hendon - but the museum's off the edge of the map so it isn't recorded. You might hope that scrolling the Google map, or zooming out, would reveal more, but no. If the event's not within a mile or so or your search point it won't appear, either on the map or on the shortlist generated underneath. Search for Muswell Hill - no events listed. Search for Ealing - nothing, even though there are events elsewhere in the borough. Search for Havering - a blank map, because the goat-related event at Havering Library isn't close enough to the designated pinpoint. I'm guessing many Outer London residents will have given up by now.
The other big difference since Monday is that location is now a "required" field, even in the Advanced Search. If you don't type in the part of London that interests you, no search is possible. Want to see all the Living History Weekend events across London on a map? Not allowed. Want to see all the events being organised by English Heritage. No can do without a location. Want to find the Alfred Hitchcock event? Sorry, you can't type "Alfred Hitchcock" into the search engine because it's not that sort of search engine.
Still, at least there's the opportunity to search by date in the Events Calendar. What's on today, 3rd June? 26 different events, apparently, although onlytwo of these are one-offs. Almost all of the rest are long-term opportunities rather than proper events, available most days this month. This list of "Art" events should give you a flavour of what I mean. But Dave Hill got caught out on Monday when he turned up at the supposedly-open Whitechapel Gallery only to find it was closed, as it is every Monday. I see that this particular date-related error's now been fixed.
But there's an event in Leyton with the opposite problem. It's the M11 Link Road "Linked" walk, an absolutely brilliant social history concept involving radio transmitters hung from lampposts. This is listed on the SoL website as being open "for one afternoon only" but has in fact been open every day since 2003. The walk requires you to hire headphones from local libraries, and only functions because lots of people don't all try to use them at the same time. Watch that system go horribly wrong on Saturday.
If you want a more useful way to find Story of London events, the themed lists in the website's sidebar are the way to go. Museums, social heritage, lectures, that sort of thing. But not the eight themed lists in the textbox at the top of the SoL homepage. Click on any the links for art, architecture, fashion, film, history, literature, music or theatre, and you only get themed events occurring today, not a complete list of all themed events. Seemingly there are no "music" events today, but when are the others? No idea, the website's a blank.
Or you could buy this week's Time Out, which has a pullout Story of London section in the middle. It's not comprehensive, but the map and listings are considerably easier to follow than the official website. For example, I'd never have spotted that the Wandle Festival was on this weekend if I hadn't seen it in print, nor noticed that Tate Britain was doing something big on Friday evening.
The Story of London could have been told so much better. But, this weekend in particular, why not try to make the best of what's available?
25 things I've learnt about sex over the last quarter century
1) Nothing ever prepares you for the first time... 2) ... not even the fact that the biology textbook always falls open at the same page 3) The first time is always a ghastly mistake (I'm extrapolating this from a single occurrence, obviously) 4) The second time isn't much better 5) It does get better eventually, but intermittently 6) Some people need it regularly and crave quantity over quality (oddly enough they're the unlucky ones) 7) Some people don't need it regularly and prefer quality to quantity (oddly enough they're the fortunate ones) 8) People in the former category should wash their sheets more often 9) You should always know where your towel is (ideally within arm's reach) 10) You always wish you were doing it more frequently than you actually are 11) Sometimes you can wait for months only for it to last for seconds 12) Remember, the other person's supposed to enjoy the experience at least as much as you are 13) People who you'd really like to do it with generally don't want to do it with you 14) People who'd really like to do it with you, you'd generally not touch with a bargepole 15) You only spot people you'd really like to do it with when it's impossible to make contact with them (eg at a funeral, on the opposite escalator, from the top of a bus, on the way into work) 16) Just because someone's gorgeous doesn't make them compatible 17) Always listen to the small inner voice that screams "no, don't" (because it's invariably correct) 18) Certain very bad things are actually terribly enjoyable 19) Unprotected, no other activity can either create a life or destroy it 20) Never do it without considering all the possible consequences 21) Never do it in a single bed and stay the night (your spine will regret it) 22) There's nothing worse than waking up next to someone you realise you shouldn't have done it with 23) There's nothing better than doing it, then falling asleep in the arms of the one you love... 24) ... just so long as they're thinking the same thing 25) You'll never forget the first time, but you'll never notice it's the last time
Today sees the start of the Story of London festival, a month-long Boris-led celebration of the capital's heritage. There are hundreds of events, most based around four themed weekends (walks, film, history and architecture). Fantastic, eh? I read all about it in a glossy 20-page leaflet that fell out of Saturday's newspaper. It made the whole thing look very impressive, but didn't quite give me all the details I needed to actually attend anything. Instead it informed me that "precise details of all of them can be found on the website: www.london.gov.uk/storyoflondon". And that's where the whole thing falls over, because the website is an impractical quagmire. Where shall we start?
Let's start with events happening next weekend, the festival's Walking Weekend. There are apparently "over 150 walks", although the website only lists 114. Some of these walks are probably local to you, and many look excellent. The problem is that all 114 walks are lumped together in a headline-only list, spread over 12 pages, with no way of re-grouping them by theme, location, time, provider or price. There's no overview of, say Blue Badge Guide-led walks, or free walks, or southwest London walks. Instead you have to trudge through the entire list, clicking on anything that sounds interesting to discover more, then clicking back to continue your trawl. Fancy a nice walk on Saturday morning followed by a nice walk on Saturday afternoon? Good luck finding two that mesh together.
Many of these walks would have been happening anyway and have simply attached themselves to the Story of London festival to attract publicity. Some aren't walks at all, just tours of buildings. One of the free walks had a booking deadline last Friday, before any of the festival's (rather belated) publicity began, so you've already missed your chance. Only 22 of the weekend's guided walks are free, the rest cost an average of £7 each (I shouldn't grumble, but I'm used to free festival events - which is clearly not the Boris way). And 24 of the walks listed aren't even taking place during the Walking Weekend at all, which is just sloppy website construction.
The festival's later weekends are a little easier to navigate, mainly because there's not much actually going on so the list of events is considerably briefer. On the whole, however, I suspect most people who end up on the website are going to lose interest clicking before they find all the gems that might have been of interest to them. And that's a shame, because events which might have been very popular risk going unnoticed and under-attended.
There is a mapsearch based on your postcode, which is quite good at getting summaries of what's on near you, but events don't open in new windows which is a pain, and the "See all results as a text list" option churns out a huge list ordered alphabetically, not by proximity. There's also the opportunity to search by date, but with the usual problem of one-off events being scattered amongst lists of month-long non-events (which is precisely the same annoying problem that plagues the - suspiciously similar - Visit London website). Sorry, it's alphabetical order or nothing, because that's all the software seems to be able to cope with. Thankfully there are also some useful "itinerary" pages (like, for example, this list of free theatre tours), otherwise event-spotting would be a real nightmare.
Let's test this out. The fabulous Crossness Pumping Station will be open on one particular day in June. How long will it take you to find out precisely when? There are also some special events happening at City Hall. Time yourself and see how long it takes you to find them. And there are only two one-off events on Thursday 18th June. How quickly can you discover them (if you can even be bothered)?
It's a shame, but event-listingwebsites appear to be increasingly drawn towards impractical automated database-driven solutions. It's like throwing several sparkly needles into a haystack, then inviting readers to try to find them. We need more listings pages written by human beings, not auto-generated by computer. Pages where somebody's selected, ordered and recommended events objectively, not assumed that they're all of equal value. Pages where you can view details of more than one event at a time, rather than having to click click click all the time to uncover what's relevant. Pages that don't leave you hunting through hundreds of pins on a slowly-generated map. Pages where events are listed in order of specialness, or rarity, not A first and Z last. Pages that are more like leaflets, and less like headline summaries. Obviously a human overview costs more, but that's because it's far more useful. Somebody somewhere needs to realise that codemonkey-generated websites aren't the optimal systems for generating comprehensive stakeholder solutions.
Sorry, I could go on and on about inadequate listing-engines for ages, it's a hobbyhorse of mine. I don't enjoy slagging off publicly funded websites, but I do despair when they could so obviously be more useful. In the meantime good luck in getting hold of a Story of London booklet, otherwise who knows what you're going to miss.
What's on this weekend? Festival of Reading 2009 Fri 4th - Sat 12th December
Meet East End authors at Tower Hamlets' Idea Stores (including Dan Cruickshank).