diamond geezer

 Friday, August 13, 2010

London's villages are hard to spot. They might once have been obvious, but centuries of urbanisation have blurred the edges of former residential nuclei, and now Walworth merges into Camberwell, Highgate merges into Hornsey and Greenford merges into Northolt. It's even more complicated in the centre of town. How far does 'Marylebone' actually stretch? Where does the West End end? What is that big area to the west of St Paul's Cathedral called?

For a lot of people, London locations are defined by their nearest station. The tube map defines where things are, even when those station names have no basis in geographic reality. "I'm in the Waterloo area." "Let's go shopping at Clapham Junction." "Yeah, we live in Bow Church". And these definitions are still a bit woolly, because it's by no means clear how far the influence of those station names spreads.

But now a new location paradigm is slipping out - firming up and redefining the way bits of the capital are named. And it looks like Boris's Cycle Hire scheme is leading the way...
I should acknowledge Londonist at this point, for a fine post yesterday pointing out how some of the new Cycle Hire stations have somewhat unexpected names. A bunch of docking stations around Old Street are apparently in "St Luke's", which is a proper old part of town, whereas further south there's a cluster in "Bank", which surely doesn't exist as a genuine placename. Then there's "West End", which is around Trafalgar Square, and "Strand", between Covent Garden and the river, and even "Southwark", which appears to be restricted to the area around the Jubilee line station. Some genuine and ancient, others tentative and artificial, but all given instant legitimacy courtesy of Barclays' two-wheeled revolution.

Thanks are also due to TfL for releasing complete public-facing data on where all the docking stations are and how many bikes/spaces they currently have. Here's the raw-ish data at Borisbikes API, and here's a site with graphs showing how bike use has fluctuated at each docking station over the last 24 hours. But this stream of information really comes into its own with Ollie's real-time map, which visualises station usage spatially and in colour. Red for full, blue for empty, which is a great way to highlight where the awkward gaps in service are. Look, someone's even knocked up a 24-hour speeded-up video showing how the centre of town is a bike cluster by day and a bike desert by night. Hurrah for public-facing open data, because amateur experts have generated far more useful services than TfL's official representation.
plaque at Lewisham stationEvery cycle docking station has a two part address (for example "New Inn Yard, Shoreditch"), the first part of which is the street (or nearby place of interest), and the second part of which is the area. It's those areas which are of interest. There's a full list of them here, so you can see they include Monument, Tower and St James's, but not Charing Cross, Oxford Street or Lambeth. Names you wouldn't normally think of using are sneaking into accepted practice, and with very precise definition. Take the three docking stations to the north of Aldwych, for example. [Kingsway, Covent Garden] [Portugal Street, Holborn] [Houghton Street, Strand] They're all within a hundred yards or so of each other, yet they're all decreed to be in separate geographic enclaves. Click around Ollie's map and you'll probably discover several other patterns, redefinitions and anomalies.

And the logic behind all this? It's the continuing rollout of the Legible London project, which began as a handful of map-packed miniliths around the Bond Street area a few years back. These smart black information boards have gradually spread around town since 2007, and have been a great way for pedestrians to work out where on earth they are and where the hell they're going. Now add cyclists to that list. All of Boris's docking stations have a Legible London map, and Legible London branding, so it's no surprise that they're using Legible London placename classification.

To aid wayfaring, Legible London has divided the centre of town up into "villages". For example, the two villages to the north of Oxford Street are Marylebone and Fitzrovia, while the two villages to the south are Mayfair and Soho. Holborn is a sprawling swathe to either side of High Holborn, while Clerkenwell curves round like a banana from almost-King's Cross to nearly-Barbican.
There must be, somewhere, a definitive Legible London map which shows precisely where one village ends and the next begins. It ought to be on the Legible London microsite, but no. There was a rough summary once, which lingers on a previous version of the site, and that's about as good as the simple stuff gets. But for anything more detailed you need to dig around a bit. There are the seeds of the 'village' idea on page 24 of the original 2006 wayfinding study (ooh that's a good read). There are some guiding principles on pages 32 and 33 of the Legible London Yellow Book (so's that). There's a lot of more recent stuff throughout TfL's Place Naming Strategy Guidance (notably page 11). And there's a bloody huge basemap on page 26 of the Legible London System Architecture guidance document (such detail). But as for the big picture, that's not really for public consumption, except in small chunks on miniliths and docking stations across the city.
The Legible London system even subdivides its "villages" down into smaller "neighbourhoods" for good measure (for example Covent Garden contains the sub-neighbourhoods of Seven Dials, Neal's Yard and Long Acre). This all helps Londoners to create their own mental maps, apparently. But it's also formalising the unplanned and crystallising the nebulous. Was it a committee, a consultation or a well-meaning administrator who defined the official boundary between King's Cross and Angel, or between Vauxhall, Oval and Kennington? Because whoever drew these accurate dividing lines on the master map has been playing God with centuries of locational evolution. And London may never be seen quite the same again.


<< click for Newer posts

click for Older Posts >>


click to return to the main page


...or read more in my monthly archives
Jan17  Feb17  Mar17  Apr17  May17  Jun17  Jul17  Aug17  Sep17  Oct17  Nov17  Dec17
Jan16  Feb16  Mar16  Apr16  May16  Jun16  Jul16  Aug16  Sep16  Oct16  Nov16  Dec16
Jan15  Feb15  Mar15  Apr15  May15  Jun15  Jul15  Aug15  Sep15  Oct15  Nov15  Dec15
Jan14  Feb14  Mar14  Apr14  May14  Jun14  Jul14  Aug14  Sep14  Oct14  Nov14  Dec14
Jan13  Feb13  Mar13  Apr13  May13  Jun13  Jul13  Aug13  Sep13  Oct13  Nov13  Dec13
Jan12  Feb12  Mar12  Apr12  May12  Jun12  Jul12  Aug12  Sep12  Oct12  Nov12  Dec12
Jan11  Feb11  Mar11  Apr11  May11  Jun11  Jul11  Aug11  Sep11  Oct11  Nov11  Dec11
Jan10  Feb10  Mar10  Apr10  May10  Jun10  Jul10  Aug10  Sep10  Oct10  Nov10  Dec10 
Jan09  Feb09  Mar09  Apr09  May09  Jun09  Jul09  Aug09  Sep09  Oct09  Nov09  Dec09
Jan08  Feb08  Mar08  Apr08  May08  Jun08  Jul08  Aug08  Sep08  Oct08  Nov08  Dec08
Jan07  Feb07  Mar07  Apr07  May07  Jun07  Jul07  Aug07  Sep07  Oct07  Nov07  Dec07
Jan06  Feb06  Mar06  Apr06  May06  Jun06  Jul06  Aug06  Sep06  Oct06  Nov06  Dec06
Jan05  Feb05  Mar05  Apr05  May05  Jun05  Jul05  Aug05  Sep05  Oct05  Nov05  Dec05
Jan04  Feb04  Mar04  Apr04  May04  Jun04  Jul04  Aug04  Sep04  Oct04  Nov04  Dec04
Jan03  Feb03  Mar03  Apr03  May03  Jun03  Jul03  Aug03  Sep03  Oct03  Nov03  Dec03
 Jan02  Feb02  Mar02  Apr02  May02  Jun02  Jul02 Aug02  Sep02  Oct02  Nov02  Dec02 

eXTReMe Tracker
jack of diamonds
Life viewed from London E3

» email me
» follow me on twitter
» follow the blog on Twitter
» follow the blog on RSS

my flickr photostream