diamond geezer

 Saturday, January 14, 2006

Mail delivery failed: return to sender

I'd like to apologise if I've sent you an email about Vi@gra, Cial!s or some other drug$ recently. I didn't mean to. I didn't mean to suggest that your performance in bed was somehow less than it should be, or to inform you of the benefits of self-enlargement, or to offer you generous reductions on international pill shipping. Honestly, I know you're not interested in that sort of thing. But it does look like I've sent out thousands of these emails recently, and I thought I'd better say sorry. Sorry.

But in fact it wasn't me who sent those emails. My computer is virus- and worm-free, so none of these mucky missives originated from my own hard drive. No, it appears that some evil spamlord has cloned my email address and is busy using it to send out filth and opportunistic drivel to unfortunate recipients all over the world. They're receiving unscrupulous email messages supposedly from my domain, but from accounts which don't actually exist. There is no such person as emilywells@myemailaddress.net, or aerisknight, or vjzi, or frankotte, or jlundon, or similar. None of these people are me. Honest.

As a result of this international criminal activity, my inbox is now under attack from a different kind of email spam - the undelivered message. In many cases the spammers have sent their poisonous messages to a non-existent email address within a genuine company or organisation. At this point over-zealous delivery software kicks in and bounces back a message to inform me that 'my mail has been undeliverable'. Thanks, but honestly, I don't care, because it wasn't me.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
Your message could not be delivered for 4.0 hours. It will be retried until it is 5.0 days old.
Übermittlung an folgende Empfänger fehlgeschlagen.
Adresse de boîte aux lettres de destination incorrecte ou inexistante.
Or maybe the destination email address does exist, but corporate spam filter software cleverly spots that the incoming message is speculative filth and so prevents it from passing through to the lucky recipient. Great, but I don't then want to receive a message back telling me how naughty I've been in sending the spam in the first place. Because it wasn't me.
Your message was blocked by our Spam Firewall. The email you sent has NOT BEEN DELIVERED:
Testing your email with detection software produced a result that indicates your mail could be unsolicited commercial advertising or other restricted content.
I apologize for this automatic reply to your email. To control spam, I now allow incoming messages only from senders I have approved beforehand.
Network Associates WebShield SMTP V4.5 MR1a on fsgw2 detected virus MultiDropper-PH in attachment unknown from and it was Deleted and Quarantined
You have apparently sent a message containing an attachment that is disallowed as defined by the State of Minnesota’s email security policy.
This steady stream of failure notices continues to clog up my inbox. They eased off over Christmas and New Year (presumably even evil spamlords take a break during the the holiday season), but now they're back again, relentless as ever. I guess my situation is better than actually receiving real spam, because at least I tend not to see the mucky content of the messages I've supposedly sent. But there are now several people out there who mistakenly believe that I'm churning out this online sewage, and I'm not. I have no reason to believe that your body parts are inappropriately proportioned and malfunction regularly. I just wanted you to know.


<< click for Newer posts

click for Older Posts >>


click to return to the main page


...or read more in my monthly archives
Jan17  Feb17  Mar17  Apr17  May17  Jun17  Jul17  Aug17
Jan16  Feb16  Mar16  Apr16  May16  Jun16  Jul16  Aug16  Sep16  Oct16  Nov16  Dec16
Jan15  Feb15  Mar15  Apr15  May15  Jun15  Jul15  Aug15  Sep15  Oct15  Nov15  Dec15
Jan14  Feb14  Mar14  Apr14  May14  Jun14  Jul14  Aug14  Sep14  Oct14  Nov14  Dec14
Jan13  Feb13  Mar13  Apr13  May13  Jun13  Jul13  Aug13  Sep13  Oct13  Nov13  Dec13
Jan12  Feb12  Mar12  Apr12  May12  Jun12  Jul12  Aug12  Sep12  Oct12  Nov12  Dec12
Jan11  Feb11  Mar11  Apr11  May11  Jun11  Jul11  Aug11  Sep11  Oct11  Nov11  Dec11
Jan10  Feb10  Mar10  Apr10  May10  Jun10  Jul10  Aug10  Sep10  Oct10  Nov10  Dec10 
Jan09  Feb09  Mar09  Apr09  May09  Jun09  Jul09  Aug09  Sep09  Oct09  Nov09  Dec09
Jan08  Feb08  Mar08  Apr08  May08  Jun08  Jul08  Aug08  Sep08  Oct08  Nov08  Dec08
Jan07  Feb07  Mar07  Apr07  May07  Jun07  Jul07  Aug07  Sep07  Oct07  Nov07  Dec07
Jan06  Feb06  Mar06  Apr06  May06  Jun06  Jul06  Aug06  Sep06  Oct06  Nov06  Dec06
Jan05  Feb05  Mar05  Apr05  May05  Jun05  Jul05  Aug05  Sep05  Oct05  Nov05  Dec05
Jan04  Feb04  Mar04  Apr04  May04  Jun04  Jul04  Aug04  Sep04  Oct04  Nov04  Dec04
Jan03  Feb03  Mar03  Apr03  May03  Jun03  Jul03  Aug03  Sep03  Oct03  Nov03  Dec03
 Jan02  Feb02  Mar02  Apr02  May02  Jun02  Jul02 Aug02  Sep02  Oct02  Nov02  Dec02 

eXTReMe Tracker
jack of diamonds
Life viewed from London E3

» email me
» follow me on twitter
» follow the blog on Twitter
» follow the blog on RSS

my flickr photostream