diamond geezer

 Wednesday, January 04, 2017

If it's a new year, especially an odd-numbered one, then I need a fresh year-long London-based challenge to complete. I've done an A-Z of London museums (2009), I've done all the lost rivers (2010), I've done the Capital Ring (2011), I've done all the tube lines (2013) and I've done unlost rivers (2015). What next?

Obviously I thought playing cards. There are 52 cards in a pack, and 52 weeks in a year, plus I'm going to be 52 this year. Now is the time. But what in London comes in 52 discrete chunks?

That took a while. But it turns out that when Greater London was formed, 52 years ago, it was originally going to have 52 boroughs. The Herbert Commission spent three years researching how best to shake up London's local government, publishing their list of recommendations in 1960. They proposed combining London with Middlesex and adding bits of Kent, Surrey, Herts and Essex. By the time legislation was submitted in 1962 these 52 boroughs had been recombined into larger groupings, to create the 33 boroughs we have today. But my eye is on those 52 boroughs from the initial list, as depicted on the map below. Let's see if I can visit one a week.



The table below shows all 52 notional London boroughs, in the order the Herbert Commission listed them. Read down the columns (the inner London boroughs come first and the outer London boroughs later). Note that what's written isn't the borough's new name but the previous districts which would be combined to create it. You'll see, for example, that there was going to be a new borough combining the Metropolitan Borough of Finsbury, the Metropolitan Borough of Holborn and the Metropolitan Borough of Shoreditch. This never happened. Instead Finsbury joined up with Islington, Holborn became part of Camden, and Shoreditch ended up in Hackney.

 CLUBS DIAMONDS HEARTS SPADES
ACity of LondonBattersea
Wandsworth (part)
Bexley
Crayford
Erith
Heston & Isleworth
2City of WestminsterHammersmith
Fulham
Chislehurst & Sidcup
Orpington
Acton
Brentford & Chiswick
3Finsbury
Holborn
Shoreditch
Kensington
Chelsea
Beckenham
Bromley
Penge
Ealing
4IslingtonPaddington
St Marylebone
CroydonHayes & Harlington
Southall
5Hackney
Stoke Newington
Hampstead
St Pancras
Caterham & Warlingham
Coulsdon & Purley
Ruislip-Northwood
Uxbridge
Yiewsley & West Drayton
6Bethnal Green
Poplar
Stepney
Chingford
Walthamstow
Banstead
Epsom & Ewell
Harrow
7WoolwichChigwell
Leyton
Wanstead & Woodford
Beddington & Wallington
Carshalton
Sutton & Cheam
Wembley
8Deptford
Greenwich
IlfordMerton & Morden
Mitcham
Wimbledon
Willesden
9LewishamRomfordBarnes
Richmond
Hendon
10CamberwellHornchurchKingston upon Thames
Malden & Coombe
Surbiton
Barnet
East Barnet
Finchley
Friern Barnet
JBermondsey
Southwark
Barking
Dagenham
Esher
Walton & Weybridge
Hornsey
Southgate
Wood Green
QLambethEast HamFeltham
Staines
Sunbury-on-Thames
Edmonton
Tottenham
KWandsworthWest HamTwickenhamCheshunt
Enfield

Now for the playing cards bit. The table's 4×13, so I've designated each column as a different suit and each row as a different value. This is of course entirely subjective, but enables me to map the list of boroughs onto a standard deck of cards. The City of London is thus represented by the Ace of Clubs, and the King of Spades stands for Cheshunt and Enfield. Excitingly the Jack of Diamonds - which is the logo for this blog - has been matched with Barking and Dagenham. I took this as a sign that I'd probably got the order right.

While we're looking at the table, let me point out that only nine of the 52 boroughs proposed by the Herbert Commission survived through to the modern day. These are A♣, 6♣, 2, 3 J, 7, 8, 10 and 6♠. It's also interesting to note that six of the tentative boroughs contain districts that never actually ended up being part of Greater London. The whole of 6 and J stayed in Surrey, because the residents weren't keen on joining the capital. Meanwhile parts of 7, 5, Q and K♠ joined London and the other parts didn't.

So anyway, here's my plan. I've taken my pack of Millennium Dome playing cards and shuffled it thoroughly. I'm going to turn over one card each week, and look it up in the table to see which imaginary borough it represents. Then I'm going to visit somewhere in that borough - anywhere that's interesting - and write about it. Expect 52 posts by the end of the year, in the order of my shuffled deck. I intend to publish one post a week, at some point during the week, if I can. But that doesn't mean I'll necessarily go out and visit one place each week because, you know, commitments. I may occasionally combine visits or stockpile trips, although I won't be peeking any further down the pack than the next card.

One thing I could do with is a decent title for this feature - something to do with cards or decks or packs or London or something. The best I've come up with so far is The Big Deal, but I'm sure you can do better.
your (better) suggestions please

From your point of view, this is no big deal. All you'll be getting is 52 posts from around London, and you get more than 52 of those on this blog every year anyway. It's me that has the challenge of finding something new to write about in each of the 52 imaginary boroughs, and taking the time to make the trip, and then telling you about it. But I have already made the first visit (sheesh, I thought on turning over the top card, not there again), and I'll reveal precisely where tomorrow.

» More about the 52 boroughs (including an approximate map) on City Metric
» More about the deliberations of the Herbert Commission on Wikipedia


Update: Thanks for your numerous excellent ideas on what to call this feature. Some were a bit long, but several were clever and snappy, and three hit the target perfectly. Travelcards is brilliant, because I'm travelling with cards, and the word is London specific (Kevin and timbo were first with that). London Shuffle is spot on, because it hints at location, playing cards and the haphazard nature of the visits (Tetramesh and Tony got in first with that). And Herbert Dip is stunning, sweetly referencing the 52 boroughs and the random process (well done Jimmy!). I really have to go with the latter, even though anybody who hasn't read today's post will never understand what it means. Herbert Dip it is.


<< click for Newer posts

click for Older Posts >>


click to return to the main page


...or read more in my monthly archives
Jan17  Feb17  Mar17
Jan16  Feb16  Mar16  Apr16  May16  Jun16  Jul16  Aug16  Sep16  Oct16  Nov16  Dec16
Jan15  Feb15  Mar15  Apr15  May15  Jun15  Jul15  Aug15  Sep15  Oct15  Nov15  Dec15
Jan14  Feb14  Mar14  Apr14  May14  Jun14  Jul14  Aug14  Sep14  Oct14  Nov14  Dec14
Jan13  Feb13  Mar13  Apr13  May13  Jun13  Jul13  Aug13  Sep13  Oct13  Nov13  Dec13
Jan12  Feb12  Mar12  Apr12  May12  Jun12  Jul12  Aug12  Sep12  Oct12  Nov12  Dec12
Jan11  Feb11  Mar11  Apr11  May11  Jun11  Jul11  Aug11  Sep11  Oct11  Nov11  Dec11
Jan10  Feb10  Mar10  Apr10  May10  Jun10  Jul10  Aug10  Sep10  Oct10  Nov10  Dec10 
Jan09  Feb09  Mar09  Apr09  May09  Jun09  Jul09  Aug09  Sep09  Oct09  Nov09  Dec09
Jan08  Feb08  Mar08  Apr08  May08  Jun08  Jul08  Aug08  Sep08  Oct08  Nov08  Dec08
Jan07  Feb07  Mar07  Apr07  May07  Jun07  Jul07  Aug07  Sep07  Oct07  Nov07  Dec07
Jan06  Feb06  Mar06  Apr06  May06  Jun06  Jul06  Aug06  Sep06  Oct06  Nov06  Dec06
Jan05  Feb05  Mar05  Apr05  May05  Jun05  Jul05  Aug05  Sep05  Oct05  Nov05  Dec05
Jan04  Feb04  Mar04  Apr04  May04  Jun04  Jul04  Aug04  Sep04  Oct04  Nov04  Dec04
Jan03  Feb03  Mar03  Apr03  May03  Jun03  Jul03  Aug03  Sep03  Oct03  Nov03  Dec03
 Jan02  Feb02  Mar02  Apr02  May02  Jun02  Jul02 Aug02  Sep02  Oct02  Nov02  Dec02 

eXTReMe Tracker
jack of diamonds
life viewed from london e3

email    twitter    G+

my flickr photostream