diamond geezer

 Tuesday, January 09, 2007

Matching pairs

Two kinds of people go shopping for clothes - those who want to and those who have to. I'm in the latter camp. I don't buy clothes often, and I don't buy clothes for fun. When I find a garment I like I'll happily wear it and wear it and wear it and wash it and wear it and wear it over and over again. I'm no slave to changing fashions. I never update my wardrobe just because street style has moved on. I'll still wear a favourite blue shirt when the rest of the world has moved on to pastel brown cardigans, or whatever the latest trend is. I'm content to stick with my minimally acceptable wardrobe from five seasons ago. I never buy something new until circumstances decree that something needs replacing. I know what I like and I like what I know.

So I was gutted to discover yesterday that my work trousers were wearing out. The material in an intimate yet hard-to-spot location was wearing thin, and I feared that one careless lurch in the office might cause the fraying fabric to rip completely causing great embarrassment. I own two identical pairs of these trousers, for alternating weeks, but (damn!) both were exhibiting identical terminal symptoms. There was no avoiding the inevitable truth - it was time to buy some replacements.

Two kinds of people buy clothes - those who seek something innovative and those who want something familiar. I'm in the latter camp. When a favourite pair of trousers wears out, I want to buy a pair exactly the same. No matter that flare fashions and pleat styles have changed. No matter that the January sales are on and I could have bought an alternative pair far more cheaply. No, I headed straight back to the original purchasing location to buy something utterly identical.

So I was gutted to discover that the shop in Covent Garden which sold me the previous trousers had closed down. Vanished, completely, without a trace. This was not a good situation for the mildly autistic clothes shopper. I didn't want to have to make fresh decisions. I wanted to buy some new old trousers and go home. Thankfully I knew of another shop round the corner run by the same manufacturers, so I headed there. I walked in and asked the assistant for the brand of trousers I was seeking. "You what" she said. "Never heard of 'em." I had to face the grim possibility that my favourite trousers had been discontinued. This was also not a good situation for the mildly autistic clothes shopper, so I quivered slightly. Thankfully it was the assistant's first day in the job, and a colleague with a longer memory suggested an alternative purchasing location.

Two kinds of people buy clothes - those who love shopping at Selfridges and those who don't. I'm in the latter camp. To me their first floor menswear department is a scary warehouse of unnecessary fashions, laid out designer brand by designer brand, staffed by haughty models with sculpted hair dressed in flawless couture. But, apparently, my trousers were in there somewhere, so I braved this hostile retail environment to try to track them down. I felt woefully underdressed in my five year-old shirt and Next overcoat, but at least nobody could see the back of my trousers.

So I was delighted to discover, eventually, in a far-flung corner, a entire wall of potential replacements. Some were the wrong colour, which was easy to spot. Some were the wrong size, which was much harder to spot because the pairs had been piled up with their labels concealed at the back of a dark shelf. And all were of different types - "Slim", "Classic", "Regular", "Comfort", etc. I realised that I couldn't remember which style I'd bought previously, which created yet another not good situation for the mildly autistic clothes shopper. So near, and yet still the possibility of total garment inconsistency. I took my life in my hands and plumped for the only style they had in my size, paid the nice people at the till and departed.

Two kinds of people buy clothes - those who are wearing new trousers to work this morning and those who aren't. I'm in the former camp. I may have paid slightly over the odds to ensure that I look exactly the same as before, but at least I can lean over in the office this morning without fear of excessive rear ventilation. I worry, however, that I should have bought two extra pairs, just to spare myself from having to going through this whole ridiculous charade again in two years' time.


<< click for Newer posts

click for Older Posts >>


click to return to the main page


...or read more in my monthly archives
Jan17  Feb17  Mar17  Apr17  May17  Jun17
Jan16  Feb16  Mar16  Apr16  May16  Jun16  Jul16  Aug16  Sep16  Oct16  Nov16  Dec16
Jan15  Feb15  Mar15  Apr15  May15  Jun15  Jul15  Aug15  Sep15  Oct15  Nov15  Dec15
Jan14  Feb14  Mar14  Apr14  May14  Jun14  Jul14  Aug14  Sep14  Oct14  Nov14  Dec14
Jan13  Feb13  Mar13  Apr13  May13  Jun13  Jul13  Aug13  Sep13  Oct13  Nov13  Dec13
Jan12  Feb12  Mar12  Apr12  May12  Jun12  Jul12  Aug12  Sep12  Oct12  Nov12  Dec12
Jan11  Feb11  Mar11  Apr11  May11  Jun11  Jul11  Aug11  Sep11  Oct11  Nov11  Dec11
Jan10  Feb10  Mar10  Apr10  May10  Jun10  Jul10  Aug10  Sep10  Oct10  Nov10  Dec10 
Jan09  Feb09  Mar09  Apr09  May09  Jun09  Jul09  Aug09  Sep09  Oct09  Nov09  Dec09
Jan08  Feb08  Mar08  Apr08  May08  Jun08  Jul08  Aug08  Sep08  Oct08  Nov08  Dec08
Jan07  Feb07  Mar07  Apr07  May07  Jun07  Jul07  Aug07  Sep07  Oct07  Nov07  Dec07
Jan06  Feb06  Mar06  Apr06  May06  Jun06  Jul06  Aug06  Sep06  Oct06  Nov06  Dec06
Jan05  Feb05  Mar05  Apr05  May05  Jun05  Jul05  Aug05  Sep05  Oct05  Nov05  Dec05
Jan04  Feb04  Mar04  Apr04  May04  Jun04  Jul04  Aug04  Sep04  Oct04  Nov04  Dec04
Jan03  Feb03  Mar03  Apr03  May03  Jun03  Jul03  Aug03  Sep03  Oct03  Nov03  Dec03
 Jan02  Feb02  Mar02  Apr02  May02  Jun02  Jul02 Aug02  Sep02  Oct02  Nov02  Dec02 

eXTReMe Tracker
jack of diamonds
Life viewed from London E3

» email me
» follow me on twitter
» follow the blog on Twitter
» follow the blog on RSS

my flickr photostream