Aren't some surveys rubbish? They're commissioned by organisations with a vested interest. They ask blatantly obvious questions. They come up with tempting yet not terribly convincing conclusions. Then some PR demon rushes out a press release stating the conclusion they knew they were going to publish anyway, which coincidentally happens to recommend one of the company's products or services. And finally, every time, lazy journalists across the media treat the outcome as proper news and reproduce the press release word for word in an orgy of free publicity. It'd be criminal if it wasn't so easy.
So I thought I'd try cataloguing the UK's most blindingly banal studies and surveys, and expose them here as 2007 progresses. Let's see how many have slipped beneath the quality radar so far this year already...
7)"People in Britain consume on average 20 different food additives every day, with some eating up to 50, a study has suggested." [Ooh, you don't say] "The survey also found that almost half of people believe frozen food contains more preservatives than chilled foods, when in fact the chilled ready meals consumed in the survey contained on average six times more preservatives than frozen ready meals." [Lifted directly from the press release, I bet] "The research was commissioned by food manufacturer Birds Eye." [A nigh perfect example of the genre]