diamond geezer

 Thursday, February 10, 2011

There are plans afoot for three London boroughs to do a bit of sharing. What with cuts looming and everything, they want to share backroom services across the three boroughs to benefit from some economies of scale. Sure, hundreds of existing employees in triplicated jobs will end up redundant. But councillors argue that's a small price to pay if care homes and school provision and other frontline services don't get slashed.

The three boroughs are Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea and Hammersmith and Fulham. Don't worry, they're not going to merge, because that would be ghastly. They'd have to call themselves The Royal City of Westminster and Kensington and Chelsea and Hammersmith and Fulham, or W&K&C&H&F for short, which'd be a real mouthful. Instead they're going to stay independent but make joint decisions on cross-borough resourcing. There'll be one Head of Street Cleaning, one Head of Trading Standards, one Head of Libraries, and so on. It's yet to be decided whether those Heads will have any staff reporting to them, or whether existing employees will be hived off into private companies who'll be contracted to do everything at reduced price. All the proposals are in a 100-page Tri-Borough report which you can read here, and either nod vigorously or shake your head and weep.

Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea and Hammersmith and Fulham aren't the only London boroughs thinking of sharing backroom services. Three groups of Labour councils have also eyed up partnership packages, although not quite deeply as W&K&C&H&F. One's Camden and Islington, who plan to pool road repairs, refuse collection and more. Another's Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham, who cover fairly similar neighbourhoods south of the Thames. And the third is Haringey and Waltham Forest, with plans for shared payroll and school meals provision.

These potential super-boroughs would punch above their separate weights. Camdislington would have a population greater than Bristol. Royal Westkenchelfulsmith would have a higher population than the whole of Buckinghamshire. Walthamgey would be more populous than Manchester. And Lamwarksham would match the combined population of Devon and Cornwall, crammed into a space no bigger than the city of Plymouth. There are plenty of economies of scale here, should Londoners choose to grasp them.

But there's a major potential problem here, which is that these groupings only work while the councils are run by the same political party. Southwark's only been Labour controlled since last spring, whereas Hammersmith and Fulham never used to be Conservative before 2006. What happens after the next election if these super-boroughs end up ruled by different parties. Where's the accountability then? A newly-elected Labour administration in H&F might want to withdraw from the service-slashing tri-borough agreement, but would find it incredibly difficult to do so. They'd have no Environmental Health department of their own, nor any parking wardens, nor a dedicated H&F library service. Everything would have to be bought back, or transferred across, or else left permanently in sold-off hands. Sharing services may be an excellent way of cutting costs, but it's a one-way transformation.

Looking deeper, why does London have 33 different recycling teams when fewer would be much more efficient? What if larger councils were indeed the best way to go? So I've had a go at dividing up the capital into super-boroughs to see how a new map of municipal London might look. It's just a bit of fun, as Peter Snow might say, and not based on any existing plans at all. Yes, I know you hate the borough nextdoor that I've paired you up with - there'd be a lot of opposition to this consolidation. But that's precisely how the last reorganisation of London's councils was carried out - three former boroughs combined to created one much larger one. These new tri-boroughs are simply the next natural step, so long as value for money's more important to you than local accountability.

Or we could go the whole hog and create a Greater London Council. That'd be more efficient still, surely, with services coordinated across the capital to give best value for all. If all goes well, Westminster and Kensington and Chelsea and Hammersmith and Fulham might wonder what they've started.


<< click for Newer posts

click for Older Posts >>


click to return to the main page


...or read more in my monthly archives
Jan17  Feb17  Mar17  Apr17  May17  Jun17  Jul17  Aug17  Sep17  Oct17  Nov17
Jan16  Feb16  Mar16  Apr16  May16  Jun16  Jul16  Aug16  Sep16  Oct16  Nov16  Dec16
Jan15  Feb15  Mar15  Apr15  May15  Jun15  Jul15  Aug15  Sep15  Oct15  Nov15  Dec15
Jan14  Feb14  Mar14  Apr14  May14  Jun14  Jul14  Aug14  Sep14  Oct14  Nov14  Dec14
Jan13  Feb13  Mar13  Apr13  May13  Jun13  Jul13  Aug13  Sep13  Oct13  Nov13  Dec13
Jan12  Feb12  Mar12  Apr12  May12  Jun12  Jul12  Aug12  Sep12  Oct12  Nov12  Dec12
Jan11  Feb11  Mar11  Apr11  May11  Jun11  Jul11  Aug11  Sep11  Oct11  Nov11  Dec11
Jan10  Feb10  Mar10  Apr10  May10  Jun10  Jul10  Aug10  Sep10  Oct10  Nov10  Dec10 
Jan09  Feb09  Mar09  Apr09  May09  Jun09  Jul09  Aug09  Sep09  Oct09  Nov09  Dec09
Jan08  Feb08  Mar08  Apr08  May08  Jun08  Jul08  Aug08  Sep08  Oct08  Nov08  Dec08
Jan07  Feb07  Mar07  Apr07  May07  Jun07  Jul07  Aug07  Sep07  Oct07  Nov07  Dec07
Jan06  Feb06  Mar06  Apr06  May06  Jun06  Jul06  Aug06  Sep06  Oct06  Nov06  Dec06
Jan05  Feb05  Mar05  Apr05  May05  Jun05  Jul05  Aug05  Sep05  Oct05  Nov05  Dec05
Jan04  Feb04  Mar04  Apr04  May04  Jun04  Jul04  Aug04  Sep04  Oct04  Nov04  Dec04
Jan03  Feb03  Mar03  Apr03  May03  Jun03  Jul03  Aug03  Sep03  Oct03  Nov03  Dec03
 Jan02  Feb02  Mar02  Apr02  May02  Jun02  Jul02 Aug02  Sep02  Oct02  Nov02  Dec02 

eXTReMe Tracker
jack of diamonds
Life viewed from London E3

» email me
» follow me on twitter
» follow the blog on Twitter
» follow the blog on RSS

my flickr photostream