diamond geezer

 Thursday, December 13, 2012

On my way to work yesterday I saw a man almost killed by a puffin.

That's a puffin crossing, the new-style pedestrian crossing that's been slowly replacing pelicans since 2006. My local pelican disappeared as part of road improvements in the run-up to the Olympics, and now we have a puffin instead. A Pedestrian user-friendly intelligent crossing is better, so we're told, but the old pelican probably wouldn't have caused yesterday's near-miss accident.

Puffin crossings have two major differences, deemed improvements. First they monitor pedestrian movements, keeping the traffic lights at red if anyone's still crossing and green if they've already crossed. That's good, clever, techno-impressive stuff. And secondly they switch the pedestrian signal from high on the lights opposite to low on a pole alongside. That's not so good, in my experience, and it's what encouraged a fellow commuter to walk into the road without thinking.

The set-up at this particular crossing is simple. There are two lanes of main road, and only one-way traffic. It's normally busy enough in the morning that you won't get across unless you press the button, and pressing the button eventually stops the traffic. But to spot that the lights have changed you have to look to your left for the green man to appear, or look up and deduce that the traffic-facing green light has switched off. Perfectly normal, utterly deliberate, the modern default.

Six of us were waiting yesterday, five on my side of the road and one on the other, while a steady stream of vehicles rolling by. It was cold, we were tired, and attention spans probably weren't at their optimum. Then a white van stopped in the lane closest to us. The driver didn't need to, there was roadspace ahead he could easily have moved into, but instead he thought he'd be kind and and let us across. Most of us waited because we couldn't see beyond the van, but one particular gentleman took his cue and started walking forward.

Had this still been a pelican crossing he'd have seen the red man shining directly ahead of him and probably thought twice. But instead the only clue at eye level was on a pole ninety degrees to his left, and he hadn't been looking there. You don't normally, not instinctively, not when you've been conditioned by several decades of staring forwards.

And so he walked out in front of the van, and was about to stride out across lane two when the sole lady waiting on the opposite pavement cried out. She'd seen what none of us on our side could, a red car speeding up the blind side behind the halted van on an imminent collision course. Its driver knew the traffic lights were still at green, so had made no attempt whatsoever to slow down, and continued forward oblivious. Ulp.

Our potential victim was jolted back into consciousness by the lady's cry. He slowed a little, just in time, and hence just missed being knocked flying. Shaken he retreated to the pavement, then the white van drove on, and all six of us waited for the traffic to stop properly. It could have been much nastier, whereas instead it fell somewhere between shocking and embarrassing. And all because the red man was hidden in plain sight where nobody thought to look.

According to the Puffin Crossings Good Practice Guide (a 58-page pdf from the Department for Transport), puffins have many benefits. Simplified displays reduce potential confusion for pedestrians (no more flashing green man) and drivers (no more flashing amber). Pedestrian demands can be cancelled when pedestrians cross prematurely, and the clearance time is always extended to allow slow pedestrians more time to cross. All should be good and lovely. But then there are those relocated lightboxes.
"With farside pedestrian signals, pedestrians look away from approaching traffic to see the pedestrian signal. When pedestrians look at a nearside Puffin pedestrian display they are also looking in the direction of approaching traffic. The traffic lights point left, and the pedestrian signals point right, the idea being that pedestrians should look towards the oncoming traffic. Seeing the approaching traffic and the pedestrian display at the same time should reduce accident risk."
Puffinisation has been carried out with good intentions, but it's not always an improvement. If pedestrians looked at these new nearside signals that'd be great, but often they don't, or won't, or even can't. Nearside signals are always concealed if you walk up to them from the wrong side, whereas signals on the far side of the road are visible across a much wider angle of approach. Nearside signals can also be completely obscured because someone else is standing next to them. But most importantly nearside signals aren't positioned where they ought to be, where generations of Britons instinctively look, and so their safety message is summarily ignored.

Well-meaning civil servants armed with safety research and risk registers have deemed that a puffin crossing is safer if used properly, so puffin crossings are what we now get. But we don't use them as the bureaucrats planned, despite their best intentions, so most of these supposed safety benefits are negated. Instead we end up using our wits to spot a gap in the traffic, almost as if no crossing mechanism had been installed, dashing out when it looks safe even if it isn't.

I'm not saying that yesterday morning's near miss accident could never have happened at a pelican crossing. Walking into the traffic when one of the lanes is concealed is a bloody stupid thing to do, lights or no lights. But surely it must be possible to devise a pedestrian crossing with farside signals that people will actually look at, to encourage them to better take control of their own safety, rather than stick with lateral lights that people ignore. I'd prefer to see puffins extinct than to watch another duped pedestrian put their life at risk unnecessarily.


<< click for Newer posts

click for Older Posts >>


click to return to the main page


...or read more in my monthly archives
Jan17  Feb17  Mar17  Apr17
Jan16  Feb16  Mar16  Apr16  May16  Jun16  Jul16  Aug16  Sep16  Oct16  Nov16  Dec16
Jan15  Feb15  Mar15  Apr15  May15  Jun15  Jul15  Aug15  Sep15  Oct15  Nov15  Dec15
Jan14  Feb14  Mar14  Apr14  May14  Jun14  Jul14  Aug14  Sep14  Oct14  Nov14  Dec14
Jan13  Feb13  Mar13  Apr13  May13  Jun13  Jul13  Aug13  Sep13  Oct13  Nov13  Dec13
Jan12  Feb12  Mar12  Apr12  May12  Jun12  Jul12  Aug12  Sep12  Oct12  Nov12  Dec12
Jan11  Feb11  Mar11  Apr11  May11  Jun11  Jul11  Aug11  Sep11  Oct11  Nov11  Dec11
Jan10  Feb10  Mar10  Apr10  May10  Jun10  Jul10  Aug10  Sep10  Oct10  Nov10  Dec10 
Jan09  Feb09  Mar09  Apr09  May09  Jun09  Jul09  Aug09  Sep09  Oct09  Nov09  Dec09
Jan08  Feb08  Mar08  Apr08  May08  Jun08  Jul08  Aug08  Sep08  Oct08  Nov08  Dec08
Jan07  Feb07  Mar07  Apr07  May07  Jun07  Jul07  Aug07  Sep07  Oct07  Nov07  Dec07
Jan06  Feb06  Mar06  Apr06  May06  Jun06  Jul06  Aug06  Sep06  Oct06  Nov06  Dec06
Jan05  Feb05  Mar05  Apr05  May05  Jun05  Jul05  Aug05  Sep05  Oct05  Nov05  Dec05
Jan04  Feb04  Mar04  Apr04  May04  Jun04  Jul04  Aug04  Sep04  Oct04  Nov04  Dec04
Jan03  Feb03  Mar03  Apr03  May03  Jun03  Jul03  Aug03  Sep03  Oct03  Nov03  Dec03
 Jan02  Feb02  Mar02  Apr02  May02  Jun02  Jul02 Aug02  Sep02  Oct02  Nov02  Dec02 

eXTReMe Tracker
jack of diamonds
Life viewed from London E3

» email me
» follow me on twitter
» follow the blog on Twitter
» follow the blog on RSS

my flickr photostream