diamond geezer

 Tuesday, September 08, 2015

When I started blogging, 13 years ago today, my blog looked like this.



Actually it didn't, it was green, but my template hasn't changed a great deal other than a switch to silver. It's still a low-fi Blogger template circa 2002, with a bank of freeflow text to the left and a 200 pixel sidebar to the right. I've never tried to force what I've written into a particular width, preferring for my words to fill whatever space you've got instead. Think of it as an early accidental example of responsive design.



By six years ago, things had changed a bit... not just the blog itself, but also the manner in which you read it. Back in 2002 the most common screen resolution had been 800×600, but by 2009 screen widths had leapt up and were well into four figures. I've scaled this second image down, but see how much more you could read in one go, with wider lines across the page and deeper paragraphs down the screen. Some readers didn't like this approach, as lines of text on some computers got so wide they were hard to scan, but I've always preferred reading more rather than less.



Nowadays it's all change as screens proliferate in a wide variety of sizes. Those attached to desktop computers tend to be large, even massive, which means my wordier posts must now flood your screen. What's shown above is how my blog appears on my laptop today, which is considerably broader than it is tall, making the paragraphs wider still. That's one reason I recently decided to display photos larger than they used to be before - see how much bigger 2015's Herne Bay statue is compared to 2009's red London bus. But not all of you are viewing my blog this way.



On a smartphone my blog looks very different. Its screen is narrow rather than wide, which is the complete opposite to the way larger computers have been evolving. My smartphone copes with my blog by shrinking down the page, meaning I have to zoom in to have any hope of being able to read anything (or I can simply turn the screen around the other way). But my current template's not ideal, indeed Google decrees it positively mobile-unfriendly, adaptable for one form of modern screen but not the other.



Even though I don't provide a mobile template, my smartphone allows me to select one anyway. As you can see the stripped-down site looks very raw, and such is the emphasis on large readable text that sometimes only three words fit on one line. I think it looks bloody stupid, but needs must, and if this format helps you to keep in touch with what I write then great. But the end result is that my blog has become little more than a string of text with pictures, and I have very little say over how you choose to see it.



My blog at least has some flexibility over how it's viewed, but many modern websites no longer offer you a choice, they make it for you. For example the BBC website was recently updated to a responsive design, in which the template checks to see what kind of screen you're viewing on and then serves up a layout to suit. I often see this coding revealed when I switch to a new news article, as a slimmed-down mobile-friendly design briefly appears before the layout reorganises itself to show me more. But alas not much more.



This is how a typical BBC News story appears on my laptop. I can always see the headline and about three-quarters of a photo, but never anything of the actual story without scrolling down. In this particular case I have to scroll down four times before I can read the entire article, because the text and photos are so relatively large, and because the wasted space alongside is so relatively wide. Auntie's coding boffins think they're delivering me an optimal experience, whereas in fact I could have read far more in one go if things were still presented as they were several years ago.



And it's not just the BBC, almost everybody's doing it these days. White space, large text, big images and chunky buttons - all of these are the modern way to present a website. That's ideal for smartphones and tablets, where clarity is required, fingers are inexact and scrolling down is expected. But those of us with big screens are being increasingly sidelined, as designers prioritise "smartphone portrait" over "laptop landscape", which isn't truly responsive design at all. If I'm still blogging in 13 years time, or even just five, I wonder whether you'll still be able to read what I've written.


<< click for Newer posts

click for Older Posts >>


click to return to the main page


...or read more in my monthly archives
Jan17  Feb17  Mar17
Jan16  Feb16  Mar16  Apr16  May16  Jun16  Jul16  Aug16  Sep16  Oct16  Nov16  Dec16
Jan15  Feb15  Mar15  Apr15  May15  Jun15  Jul15  Aug15  Sep15  Oct15  Nov15  Dec15
Jan14  Feb14  Mar14  Apr14  May14  Jun14  Jul14  Aug14  Sep14  Oct14  Nov14  Dec14
Jan13  Feb13  Mar13  Apr13  May13  Jun13  Jul13  Aug13  Sep13  Oct13  Nov13  Dec13
Jan12  Feb12  Mar12  Apr12  May12  Jun12  Jul12  Aug12  Sep12  Oct12  Nov12  Dec12
Jan11  Feb11  Mar11  Apr11  May11  Jun11  Jul11  Aug11  Sep11  Oct11  Nov11  Dec11
Jan10  Feb10  Mar10  Apr10  May10  Jun10  Jul10  Aug10  Sep10  Oct10  Nov10  Dec10 
Jan09  Feb09  Mar09  Apr09  May09  Jun09  Jul09  Aug09  Sep09  Oct09  Nov09  Dec09
Jan08  Feb08  Mar08  Apr08  May08  Jun08  Jul08  Aug08  Sep08  Oct08  Nov08  Dec08
Jan07  Feb07  Mar07  Apr07  May07  Jun07  Jul07  Aug07  Sep07  Oct07  Nov07  Dec07
Jan06  Feb06  Mar06  Apr06  May06  Jun06  Jul06  Aug06  Sep06  Oct06  Nov06  Dec06
Jan05  Feb05  Mar05  Apr05  May05  Jun05  Jul05  Aug05  Sep05  Oct05  Nov05  Dec05
Jan04  Feb04  Mar04  Apr04  May04  Jun04  Jul04  Aug04  Sep04  Oct04  Nov04  Dec04
Jan03  Feb03  Mar03  Apr03  May03  Jun03  Jul03  Aug03  Sep03  Oct03  Nov03  Dec03
 Jan02  Feb02  Mar02  Apr02  May02  Jun02  Jul02 Aug02  Sep02  Oct02  Nov02  Dec02 

eXTReMe Tracker
jack of diamonds
life viewed from london e3

email    twitter    G+

my flickr photostream