diamond geezer

 Thursday, January 13, 2011

London 2012  Olympic update
  Stratford Hotspur


It's costing half a billion pounds to erect London's Olympic Stadium. For a couple of fortnights in 2012 it'll be the focus of global attention, packed out with spectators watching world-class athletes compete. But what happens next is yet to be decided. Either West Ham or Tottenham Hotspur will move out of their current ground and make Stratford their home. We'll know soon who the lucky team is. But if Tottenham Hotspur get their way, the entire £537m structure will be ripped down so that they can start again. And that can't be right.

When the design for the Olympic stadium was announced in 2007, the most important word was 'sustainability'. An athletics legacy had been promised to the IOC, so the entire structure would need to be scaled down after the Games. No football takeover was envisaged. The organisers designed an arena with a detachable top, which meant eighty thousand spectators during the Olympics could be slimmed down to twenty-five thousand afterwards. There'd be no long-term infrastructure inside the stadium - all the food, bars and toilets would be in temporary pods outside. This would be no over-sized white elephant come 2013, that was the plan.

And here we are in 2011 with two legacy bids on the table, both from major football clubs. West Ham's proposal keeps the running track, so that both football and athletics can still take place. They've teamed up with Newham Council, for added community bonus points, and plan to sell off their existing Boleyn Ground for housing. That extra cash would allow the restructuring the top of the Olympic bowl to build those all-important urinals, private boxes and burger stalls. West Ham's is the socially responsible option, the community bid that keeps all past promises. OK, so the team's currently floundering at the foot of the Premiership and look to be headed for Championship oblivion, but a lot can change over three seasons and they might fill sixty thousand seats with ease.

Then there's Tottenham, who launched themselves late into the bidding war with what some saw as a pre-emptive strike. Bosses had been trying to redevelop White Hart Lane for years, without success, so expressing an interest in the Stratford site opened up another option. Permission back in N17 has since been granted, but Tottenham's fixation on E15 has grown stronger ever since. They've teamed up with entertainment company AEG, who also run the O2, with plans for a combined football/entertainment venue. Expect Britney concerts as well as local derbies, and absolutely no athletics at all. An eight lane track would leave spectators too far from from the pitch, they argue, so plan instead to pump money into the existing Crystal Palace Stadium to provide an athletics legacy elsewhere.

A big club like Spurs would guarantee a rock solid future for the Olympic Stadium site, but not for the stadium itself. That would be entirely demolished, apart from some of the undercroft beneath, and a brand new full-capacity arena built instead. Tottenham and AEG only want the infrastructure improvements and transport connections, it seems, plus a fresh slate on which to start again. Their replacement would no doubt end up with some ghastly sponsored name, like the Vodafone Arena or the Carphone Warehouse, and would completely erase all memory of the 2012 stadium from the map.

Whichever club's successful, their supporters are going to have to get used to relocation. For Hammers fans that'd be a three mile shift - though much nearer to West Ham station and staying within the old "West Ham" borough which gave the team its name. Tottenham would have to move five miles, well away from their spiritual home, and that's left many supporters very angry indeed. "No to Stratford Hotspur!" they demand, even if that means losing out on improved facilities and a richer club.

Will we get West Ham and athletics, or will we get Tottenham and Take That? The Olympic Park Legacy Company are due to announce their choice before the end of the month. All that we can guarantee when the final decision's announced is that the stadium's architects, however well briefed, guessed wrongly what kind of legacy venue would be required. Political change and economic reality have shifted priorities, and might well result in half a billion pounds worth of taxpayers money being unceremoniously demolished. My heart's with the Hammers, but my head fears the sledgehammer option instead.


<< click for Newer posts

click for Older Posts >>


click to return to the main page


...or read more in my monthly archives
Jan17  Feb17  Mar17  Apr17  May17
Jan16  Feb16  Mar16  Apr16  May16  Jun16  Jul16  Aug16  Sep16  Oct16  Nov16  Dec16
Jan15  Feb15  Mar15  Apr15  May15  Jun15  Jul15  Aug15  Sep15  Oct15  Nov15  Dec15
Jan14  Feb14  Mar14  Apr14  May14  Jun14  Jul14  Aug14  Sep14  Oct14  Nov14  Dec14
Jan13  Feb13  Mar13  Apr13  May13  Jun13  Jul13  Aug13  Sep13  Oct13  Nov13  Dec13
Jan12  Feb12  Mar12  Apr12  May12  Jun12  Jul12  Aug12  Sep12  Oct12  Nov12  Dec12
Jan11  Feb11  Mar11  Apr11  May11  Jun11  Jul11  Aug11  Sep11  Oct11  Nov11  Dec11
Jan10  Feb10  Mar10  Apr10  May10  Jun10  Jul10  Aug10  Sep10  Oct10  Nov10  Dec10 
Jan09  Feb09  Mar09  Apr09  May09  Jun09  Jul09  Aug09  Sep09  Oct09  Nov09  Dec09
Jan08  Feb08  Mar08  Apr08  May08  Jun08  Jul08  Aug08  Sep08  Oct08  Nov08  Dec08
Jan07  Feb07  Mar07  Apr07  May07  Jun07  Jul07  Aug07  Sep07  Oct07  Nov07  Dec07
Jan06  Feb06  Mar06  Apr06  May06  Jun06  Jul06  Aug06  Sep06  Oct06  Nov06  Dec06
Jan05  Feb05  Mar05  Apr05  May05  Jun05  Jul05  Aug05  Sep05  Oct05  Nov05  Dec05
Jan04  Feb04  Mar04  Apr04  May04  Jun04  Jul04  Aug04  Sep04  Oct04  Nov04  Dec04
Jan03  Feb03  Mar03  Apr03  May03  Jun03  Jul03  Aug03  Sep03  Oct03  Nov03  Dec03
 Jan02  Feb02  Mar02  Apr02  May02  Jun02  Jul02 Aug02  Sep02  Oct02  Nov02  Dec02 

eXTReMe Tracker
jack of diamonds
Life viewed from London E3

» email me
» follow me on twitter
» follow the blog on Twitter
» follow the blog on RSS

my flickr photostream