I'm not always very good at answering the questions you leave in the comments. So here are answers to all the questions you've left so far this year, in approximately chronological order.
» Yes, that's what they called themselves, I'm only repeating it.
» I don't think so, they're very different circumstances.
» A perfectly rational interpretation of the risks ahead.
» Quite a lot really, which is the point of them.
» I'm pretty sure it wasn't.
» No older than 1990 when the current waterwheel logo was introduced.
» It wasn't funny the first time.
» You probably can, you know everything.
» Yes, no and yes, paradoxically.
» Yes of course, because otherwise it wouldn't have said so.
» Not my best turn of phrase, sorry, but it certainly lacks a certain social cachet.
» You'd think wrong, they're too busy watching the road.
» I assume that's rhetorical.
» I have no idea what you're going on about.
» What a depressingly patronising thing to ask.
» Perhaps.
» Because it's not the correct designation.
» Yes it does matter, especially at three in the morning.
» They obviously didn't.
» Yes, I suspect they probably are (not that it's had any effect as yet).
» This makes no sense.
» I very much doubt that's their assumption.
» The Guardian (and I don't know the rest of the answer, obviously).
» Yes.
» Yes and No.
» That hadn't even been invented at the time, so no.
» An entirely fictional location, so no.
» That is indeed what I wrote.
» Trust me, I can withstand that with ease.
» It's more personal than that.
» You really hate not knowing, don't you.
» They don't count.
» Seemingly not.
» I fear you missed the post in which this list was provided.
» I enjoy the fact that you do.
» No, your presumed conclusion is incorrect.
» I don't think I could wring enough out of that.
» Because the Thames is to the south.
» Only until 1939, so your exclamation marks are unwarranted.
» I don't know, I'm not a stalker.
» That has to be a possibility.
» Those aren't questions, they're statements with question marks on the end.
» It did not.
» You were there, you tell us.
» It was, sorry, my mistake.
» Yes, I read that on Wikipedia too, but chose not to include it.
» Hang on and I'll do precisely that.
» I increasingly suspect it wasn't official until later.
» If it were possible, I'm sure they'd have done it.
» Almost certainly.
» Wait and see.
» Obviously not, they'd never come here.
» They've had ample opportunity previously.
» It's meaningless, I agree.
» I think the premise of your question is flawed.
» You shouldn't have asked that, you'll set them off.
» See, I told you.
» Because it's two routes.
» They tried that between 1994 and 1996, but haven't again since.
» I doubt it implies anything.
» A fraction of £1.35m, and it's too late for that now.
» Yes, the reason you have suggested is correct.
» I have done exactly this.
» No, this is not something such personnel normally do.
» That is a certainly a possibility (and so is that).
» By the end of the weekend I'd say the latter.
» Buses cannot breathe, so your conclusion is ludicrous.
» I should never have answered that earlier question, sorry.
» Given the final budget, presumably more.
Sometimes I don't answer because I don't know the answer.
Sometimes I don't answer because someone else already has.
Sometimes I don't answer because it'd be great if someone else did.
Sometimes I don't answer because I'm not here to answer all your questions.
Sometimes I don't answer because I was being deliberately vague in the post.
Sometimes I don't answer because there is no polite response and it's best I keep quiet.
Sometimes I don't answer because the conversation which ensued would be very tedious.
Sometimes I don't answer because the way the question was phrased was somewhat patronising.
Sometimes I don't answer because some of my more tenacious commenters would get over-excited.
Sometimes I don't answer because you weren't really looking for an answer.
Sometimes I don't answer because you've asked a question you already know the answer to.
Sometimes I don't answer because you're merely stating a point of view but adding a question mark on the end in the hope that someone else will agree with you and validate your opinion.
And if those last three are you, perhaps you could be bold enough to write a statement next time, rather than a question.
