I hate it when websites upgrade. Somebody in control thinks they have a better model with better functionality and changes everything overnight. They're often wrong. Upgraded websites may be more efficient and more effective, but they often lose the vital spark that made them worth visiting in the first place. And so it is with my local council website. Tower Hamlets, you've really blown it.
Yes, this is another 'local' post. You might want to ignore the following because it doesn't relate to your council. Or you might read on, in case the Website Upgrade Squad are planning to visit your local council next.
Last month the Tower Hamlets council website was big and white and detailed, with a variety of links to council services and local information. There were links to news items, upcoming events and jobs, as well as direct routes to key services like housing, schools and libraries. It wasn't cutting edge, but it was functional. It looked a bit like this.
Last week the Tower Hamlets website upgraded. This was no mini revamp, this was wholesale overnight transformation. The old structure was swept away and a completely new format put in its place. New layout, new structure, new link hierarchy. It looks a lot like this. And I absolutely hate it.
Visitors to Tower Hamlets are assured of a wealth of history, a richness of culture and some truly fascinating ancient and modern places to explore and enjoy. Whether you want to immerse yourself in history at The Tower of London, immerse yourself in the culture of one of our many museums and galleries, enjoy the hustle and bustle of the borough’s markets or simply experience the area’s vibrant culture, Tower Hamlets has something for everyone.
And that's all. Replace "The Tower of London" with any other tourist attraction and this bland description could refer to any local authority anywhere in the country. It looks as if Tower Hamlets have bought some generic council website text from a company that makes generic council websites, and have adapted it only very slightly. And the text is equally generic (and brief) on the following hub pages...
» Leisure and Culture: There is plenty to do in Tower Hamlets for residents and visitors to the borough, with many services offered by the council including arts, sports, children's activities and library events. » Community & living: Information about how to get involved in Tower Hamlet's communities, and services helping you with your life in Tower Hamlets. » Education & Learning: Tower Hamlet's Children's Education and Social Care services have joined to form the new Children Services. Our aim is to promote achievement through learning for all people who live, work, study and teach in the borough.
Yes, those last two pages really do each contain a dodgy misplaced apostrophe. Just to reiterate, the Tower Hamlets education homepage spells Hamlet's with an apostrophe. Don't tell the Daily Mail, will you? It gets better. The same page also has information about school closures in the (cough) current snowy weather. All schools have worked hard to ensure they will be safe for the children and we hope they will all open tomorrow. However, we are aware that Bishop Challoner (Boys and Girls) and Langdon Park Secondary schools are expected to remain closed. This news is at least a week out of date, but nobody at the council webteam has yet removed it. Pupils at either of these schools might try citing the website as a reason to stay off lessons for further notice.
Let's try a couple of the other main sections listed on the Tower Hamlets homepage. Starting with Latest News. The headline item of latest news is an article encouraging people to Vote for your favourite park. Great, except that Boris's park vote closed last month, so you're too late. There are only eight news stories on the site altogether, because the upgrade has erased several years of news archive. Never mind, eh, fresh slate. As for What's new, erm... "no news articles found". Meanwhile, how about the What's on / events section? Only two 'events' are linked from the homepage. One's a job opportunity in a Newham park cafe (wrong borough, not an event) and the other's refers to Tendering and procurement awareness training (This page is no longer available). On the main Events page it's worse. There's apparently just the one event in the borough for the foreseeable future - a funding workshop for football clubs. Only council-run events count these days, because this is a council-only website.
What else has vanished? The entire archive of the council's East End Life free newspaper. This wasn't all self-congratulatory puff, there were plenty of historical and human interest reports too. All wiped. And the pages about interesting walks to try in Tower Hamlets, they've gone too. Last August, when I compared all of London's 33 borough websites for their walk-friendliness, I gave Tower Hamlets a rare four stars for including downloadable pdfs of several heritage strolls. Not any more. All there is now is a brief exhortation that "walking is good for you". One-star, maximum. The council can't walk for you, so they've no longer any interest in promoting self-guided walks on their website.
And one last example of very-poor-ness. Tower Hamlets is an Olympic Host Borough. That's pretty prestigious, and carries with it a burden of planning, coordination and dissemination. I know this because there used to be a big Olympic section on the council website, complete with timeline, benefits and volunteering opportunities. Where is it now? No idea. I've ploughed through the website's dense new sitemap, but I can't find it. I've also tried typing "Olympics" into the search engine, but all I get is a selection of disjoint unhelpful results. I think, by the looks of it, that the entire Olympics section has vanished. The Olympics isn't a council-run service, so it doesn't merit appearing on the new council-run website. Petty, parochial, short-sighted.
In conclusion, the Tower Hamlets website is now generic, amateur and dull. It's about online government, not community. It's slipped from interesting to tedious, and from characterful to bland. It looks like a website designed to meet targets rather than to inspire. It appears to have been designed by non-local codemonkeys using an off-the-peg database-driven solution. All of the old links which worked last month have broken, and several new links don't work either. The new content is vacuous and brief. Some of the key pages are incorrectly punctuated and out of date. It's probably easier for residents with English as a second language to read, but not to navigate. In short, it's completely lost the human touch. One day all council websites will be made this way. May yours not be next.
6pm update: Ooh, the Education and Learning homepage has now been updated to contain a) some useful information, b) no out-of-date information, c) no dodgy apostrophe. Result! However, there's still a dodgy apostrophe on Community and living if you fancy a laugh.
I like newspapers. I buy one nearly every day and attempt to read it on the train. Sometimes I nab a free paper if I need something extra to read on the journey home. I also get a free paper shoved through my letterbox every week whether I want it or not. And all these newspapers always end up sitting in my hallway, in a big pile, in a very big pile. I have an awful lot of newspapers.
I like to recycle my newspapers. When you have a lot of newspapers it's only fair to recycle them rather that chuck them into landfill. But people don't make it easy for me. There are no recycling bins on the tube, because non-existent terrorism is more important than recycling. There are no recycling bins outside the entrance to Bow Road station, so I can't chuck anything away there. There are no recycling bins on my walk home, not without wandering a couple of minutes out of my way. And there are no council recycling bins at my house either, only normal bins. If I want to recycle, it takes effort.
I'd like to recycle my newspapers but Tower Hamlets don't make it easy. They're starting to try, sort of, at last, but they're still not trying very hard. Only in the last few months, where I live at least, have they started offering doorstep collections. Council workers introduced this new system by dumping not enough pink recycling sacks on my communal doorstep, with no instructions attached. Each sack is printed with details of what can be recycled, but not what to do with the sack when it's full. To discover the day of my recycling collection I have to go to the Tower Hamlets website and plough through 89 impenetrable pages of pdf to find my street. Or alternatively I can email someone at the council and they'll look through the 89 page pdf on my behalf and email me back. I think my day's Tuesday. Or maybe Thursday. Or possibly Monday or Friday, I don't know, it's bloody hard to follow.
If I try to recycle my newspapers in a pink sack, as directed, it goes wrong. On day 1 I leave my pink sack out on the pavement awaiting collection. On day 2 I note that my pink sack is still where I left it and that the collecting lorry hasn't been. On day 3 I spot that my pink sack has been kicked across the pavement by some passing ruffian and the top has come untied risking major spillage. And on day 4 I despair that all of my newspapers are now scattered across the pavement or lying soggy in the gutter, revealing my reading matter to all and sundry. By day 5 it's clear it would have been better for the environment had I not attempted to recycle my newspapers at all. Is it any surprise that on day 8 I'm reticent to attempt the same thing again.
I usually end up recycling my newspapers via the pre-doorstep method. I bundle them all up in a binbag and struggle out into the street carrying my oversized package. I manouevre my way past pedestrians and heavy traffic, taking care not to topple over and spill everything. I stagger for several minutes to my local recycling centre, where I'm usually scrutinised by three drunkards and a stumpy dog. If I'm lucky one of the five purple recycling bins has some space left, and I can post my newspapers a few at a time into the inadequate gap. If I'm unlucky all five bins are full and I'm left looking like an idiot clutching a stack of increasingly unstable newspapers. At this point I can either dump my papers beside the bin (fail), wander over to a nearby tower block and dump my papers in their recycling bin (naughty) or else lug everything back home and try again later (fat chance, life's too short).
I've not recycled enough newspapers lately, because it's too much effort. Indeed I've failed to throw out a single newspaper since the start of the year, and so they've piled up and piled up. I've got into a vicious circle - they pile up, so they're more effort to take out, so they pile up more, so they're even more effort to take out, etc. I now have as many as 134 newspapers (and newspaper sections) needing to be recycled, plus 25 magazines, which adds up to a whopping foot-and-a-half-high stack of newsprint awaiting disposal. It'd be easy with a car (and a boot), but it's less fun on foot. It'd be easy with a decent doorstep collection, but alas this is Tower Hamlets. So it's not easy.
I still like newspapers, but they're proving increasingly difficult to discard. I really ought to lug my mega-pile across to the recycling centre, probably in two batches of 67, but I fear I'll drop them all on the way (and the bins are probably full). I could try leaving them on the doorstep in a big pink sack, but I don't believe they'd disappear (except into the street). Or I could just throw them all into my normal non-recycling bin, just to get rid of them (which would be quick and easy, but would also be naughty because they'd all end up in landfill). Ah, this would be so easy if I hadn't developed a non-recycler's guilt complex. But I really need to sort this problem out soon, before my hallway becomes overwhelmed by towering newsprint. Quick, because there'll be 140 by nightfall...